Why are people dead set on trading jc or bogey? It should be ingles
Because of skills and fits. Ingles isn't the most prolific scorer of the 3, but is the one that can contribute on the most different ways and fit the better/be the less expendable post trade in nearly any trade scenario, if not his game being helped by its results (and for that the one problably the easier to acomodate after a trade that the team looked after a guy that could that a role as big as Conley on offense). Bogey can't make a good pass for his life (like, his playmaking ain't really convincing, but his passing is really worse than his rebounding), his dribble is turnover prone, and on rebounding and defense overall he's like as bad or worse even being stronger, faster, more athletic, on a larger body frame in identical height compared to Joe. And JC, for the good and the bad is JC madness, he buys into his role and works hard (now even harder on d, even if his works hard doesn't translate into a greater consistency of quality of play on that end), but his role is what it is, score, plain and simple. And for as good as he may be for his charisma, good locker room vibe morale boost, in game momentum swing and crowd agitator, that's a league where scoring bench guards with decent but streaky 3 point shots and questionable overall efficiency and defense are much easier to find (like nearly all over the place, as if it grows on trees or fall from the skies) than swiss arm knife wings with great 3 point shooting and game style suited to keep effective (of course in gradually decreasing usage and role) till way in his late 30ies (even if his defense not).
Of course if it came down to him needing to be included on a trade for the final piece to go all in for the title you would still move Joe, even if looking at it thinking "we won, but at what cost ?" (as maybe to a lesser extent due to less time with us would be the feeling trading Clarkson), but in terms of making sense to trade, Bogey or JC should be some more interesting in terms of what we lose and what we keep