Rule clarification

[franklin]

Spazz noted that posting a music video containing filtered words (in the music, not the title) might be a violation. Is this true?

TIA.

 

[YB85]

That is the rule. This is a family website, so keep it clean. If you want profanity, go watch the video of the snowboarders getting harassed at Snow Basin on ksl.com. They allow F bombs on their site but have the warning on the video.

 

[colton]

Spazz noted that posting a music video containing filtered words (in the music, not the title) might be a violation. Is this true?

Correct.

 

[Scat]

Spazz noted that posting a music video containing filtered words (in the music, not the title) might be a violation. Is this true?

TIA.

Now you care about the rules?

 

[franklin]

Correct.

I should have added detail. Correct it might be a violation or correct it is a violation? And is this for embedded videos only or are links to youtube stuff also a violation?

 

[Gameface]

I should have added detail. Correct it might be a violation or correct it is a violation? And is this for embedded videos only or are links to youtube stuff also a violation?

A direct link to prohibited content is a violation as far as I know. I got an infraction for posting a link to a website that had some random information regarding the male body part. It was mostly just factual info using the correct scientific terms for things.

 

[colton]

Yes, our general policy is that if the content can't be posted directly to Jazzfanz, then a link to said content can't be posted either.

 

[Gyp Rosetti]

Where does porn fit into all this?

 

[franklin]

Thanks all. This was spurred from a clean song that said the poop word (clean enough for spazz who edits dirty posts before quoting them).