What's new
By:

Rumor: Utah Jazz Could Help Cavs Create Trade Exception

franklin said:
Just a tad over-the-top.
Click to expand...
Addition by subtraction.
Poor defender, poor distributor, I remember seeing a stat that he was the worst shooter in nba history or something for a player who took as many shots as he did, doesnt get to the line.

He is a good dribbler though. We would really miss his dribbling.

Jazz traded kanter and got better. I think the same thing might happen if we trade trey. The old addition by subtraction situation
 
fishonjazz said:
Addition by subtraction.
Poor defender, poor distributor, I remember seeing a stat that he was the worst shooter in nba history or something for a player who took as many shots as he did, doesnt get to the line.

He is a good dribbler though. We would really miss his dribbling.

Jazz traded kanter and got better. I think the same thing might happen if we trade trey. The old addition by subtraction situation
Click to expand...

The Tad double down?

Speaking of, I saw your boy Sidney Lowe as 3rd on a list of having the worst shooting season of all time. I'm blaming him. Maybe Black Trey can resurrect himself now that Coach Sid is gone.
 
franklin said:
The Tad double down?

Speaking of, I saw your boy Sidney Lowe as 3rd on a list of having the worst shooting season of all time. I'm blaming him. Maybe Black Trey can resurrect himself now that Coach Sid is gone.
Click to expand...
My boy sidney lowe lol. Never heard of him till a he joined the jazz staff and have had no opinion on him since then.

I didn't think trey would be and good from the before he was even drafted.

His career so far has done nothing to change my opinion of him...... In fact he has been worse than I thought he would be
 
fishonjazz said:
Addition by subtraction.
Poor defender, poor distributor, I remember seeing a stat that he was the worst shooter in nba history or something for a player who took as many shots as he did, doesnt get to the line.

He is a good dribbler though. We would really miss his dribbling.

Jazz traded kanter and got better. I think the same thing might happen if we trade trey. The old addition by subtraction situation
Click to expand...
This
fishonjazz said:
My boy sidney lowe lol. Never heard of him till a he joined the jazz staff and have had no opinion on him since then.

I didn't think trey would be and good from the before he was even drafted.

His career so far has done nothing to change my opinion of him...... In fact he has been worse than I thought he would be
Click to expand...

The only reason I knew who he was before he coached here was because as a kid I collected basketball cards. I got his card once in a pack looked at his stats on the back and thought my god!! Worst player ever. So when he joined the org as a coach I thought my god!! We have the worst player to ever play coaching the Jazz and things just went down hill from there.
 
fishonjazz said:
My boy sidney lowe lol. Never heard of him till a he joined the jazz staff and have had no opinion on him since then.

I didn't think trey would be and good from the before he was even drafted.

His career so far has done nothing to change my opinion of him...... In fact he has been worse than I thought he would be
Click to expand...

Getting rid of Kanter was addition by subtraction because it increased Gobert's minutes and role. If ,say, Booker was Kanter's replacement, the team would not have improved simply by getting rid of Kanter.

I think Burke is pretty worthless as a player. However, since his salary is so low, it makes little sense to get rid of him for nothing. Freeing up minutes for Cotton or Neto is pretty meaningless. And there is always the slim chance that Burke will improve.
 
I say give Burke one more look. There is no hurry to ship him off. We invested heavily with two first round picks. At the very least, let's try to see if he can improve his value and we can get something of value back. He does have the USA team invite going for his value.

I'm a believer in people and underdogs. If someone works hard enough they can over come their weaknesses and shortcomings. If he shoots really good next year, that's all it would take really. Then he would have a different look to him. If he shoots 38% from 3, and 47 % fg, then that could be a huge boost in value, and he doesn't even have to become quicker. Just do that, along with some better decision making then we have something. It's not impossible. Give him another look.
 
Siro said:
Getting rid of Kanter was addition by subtraction because it increased Gobert's minutes and role. If ,say, Booker was Kanter's replacement, the team would not have improved simply by getting rid of Kanter.

I think Burke is pretty worthless as a player. However, since his salary is so low, it makes little sense to get rid of him for nothing. Freeing up minutes for Cotton or Neto is pretty meaningless. And there is always the slim chance that Burke will improve.
Click to expand...
Cotton, neto > than burke doe.
Addition by subtraction still stands. Not nearly as big a case as shedding kanter....... It would just be a minor addiction by subtraction but for me a minor improvement is better than none at all
 
Hack said:
If he shoots 38% from 3, and 47 % fg, then that could be a huge boost in value, and he doesn't even have to become quicker.
Click to expand...

That would make him one of the best PGs in the league...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top