What's new

Rumors of the Republican demise have been greatly exagerated

Because people on twitter are legitimately retarded and want to blame racism and sexism for everything.

Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app

it's not a chicken or the egg situation, the media misled the masses. **** they even fooled Vegas!!!!!!

I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts.

- Abraham Lincoln
 
2004 election:
Bush: 62,040,610 votes
Pct of population: 21%

2008 election:
McCain: 59,948,323 votes
Pct of population: 18%

2012 election:
Romney: 60,933,504 votes
Pct of population: 19%

2016 election:
Trump: 59,937,338 votes
Pct of population: 16.7%

Looks like a wave that is going back out to sea.
 
Because people on twitter are legitimately retarded and want to blame racism and sexism for everything.

Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app

Yeah, to me the whole takeaway from this election isn't that the GOP is alive and well, but that the Dems aren't much better off. The two party system really does suck, and I only wish I believed things could improve.
 
... I'm guessing sooner than later, those supporting the oompa loompa will follow the example of people like the Bushes and Glen Beck, and disown Trump from the party.

I disagree. The Republicans are all about winning. Governing, policies, etc all take a back seat to good, old-fashioned, being-in-charge. Trump gave the republicans the presidency. They'll always love him for that... unless he loses it.

220px-George_H._W._Bush%2C_President_of_the_United_States%2C_1989_official_portrait.jpg
 
2004 election:
Bush: 62,040,610 votes
Pct of population: 21%

2008 election:
McCain: 59,948,323 votes
Pct of population: 18%

2012 election:
Romney: 60,933,504 votes
Pct of population: 19%

2016 election:
Trump: 59,937,338 votes
Pct of population: 16.7%

Looks like a wave that is going back out to sea.

Yea, but show the opposite, and give the % of the population that actually voted.
What percent of the voting population did each side have?

What percent of the population can legally vote?

Those numbers by themselves mean nothing without context.
 
Yea, but show the opposite, and give the % of the population that actually voted.
What percent of the voting population did each side have?

What percent of the population can legally vote?

Those numbers by themselves mean nothing without context.

Yup, like Quartebacks putting up different numbers in different offenses, or baseball players having different stats in different eras. Silly to judge numbers from different elections without putting them in context.
 
2004 election:
Bush: 62,040,610 votes
Pct of population: 21%

2008 election:
McCain: 59,948,323 votes
Pct of population: 18%

2012 election:
Romney: 60,933,504 votes
Pct of population: 19%

2016 election:
Trump: 59,937,338 votes
Pct of population: 16.7%

Looks like a wave that is going back out to sea.
Good call leaving the votes and percentages for Democrats out of this post.
 
Back
Top