The guess is that Knight would go 5. So no pgs at 12. But it isn't that likely. The interesting thing is that Leonard might be there at 12.
Sacramento trading thier #7 pick
- Thread starter Shocker00
- Start date
The guess is that Knight would go 5. So no pgs at 12. But it isn't that likely. The interesting thing is that Leonard might be there at 12.
AlaskanAssassin
Well-Known Member
I'm having trouble following Sacramento's logic. They gave up Beno Udrih and the #7 for Salmons and the #10.
What is their motivation here? Were they dying for John Salmons?
What is their motivation here? Were they dying for John Salmons?
There's a lot of speculation that Toronto could take Biyombo, if they do, Knight might very well fall to 9. This trade totally changes the dynamic of 7-12, so the only things that can be said with complete certainty are Thompson @7 and Jimmer @10.
BENTLEY
Well-Known Member
Maloofs wanted Fredette. Coaches said the backcourt was too crowded and they really needed a SF more. They just got rid of Beno and added a SF who succeeded in Sactown a few years ago. Suffice it to say Fredette is a King.
I don't understand it on Sacramento's part. They traded a good Salmons contract for a bad Noci contract then when Noci's contracts up they trade for a bad Salmons contract and move down in the draft at the same time. Maybe we should see if we can get rid of memo's terrible contract and the #3 pick for the #1 pick
Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
It's not like Jimmer was lighting it up on d either. Who will be better on d.... My guess is the 6-6 player, also he's not soft.
Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
Also a lot more athletic then people give him credit for.
But they just traded for Salmons?
They want to sell some tickets. So they're trading Udrih for Fredette, and assuming that the player they'd get at 7 isn't a better wing than Salmons. Just guessing here.
DutchJazzer
Banned
then jazz should take valanciunas. spurs are the best drafting team imho. look at who they drafted over the years.