What's new

Scab players

What the owners need to do is give another ultimatum that they will shut the league down for 3-5 years if the players don't sign the agreement. That would essentially end the careers of most current players (Bryant and Garnett for sure and possibly Wade and LeBron?). I think once the players faced the possibility of having to go find a real job (one that only pays $30-$60K a year or go play overseas) I think they would sign in a minute.
I'm no lawyer or anything, and I could be wrong, but I have a hard time believing the courts would let that happen, just my opinion.
 
What the owners need to do is give another ultimatum that they will shut the league down for 3-5 years if the players don't sign the agreement. That would essentially end the careers of most current players (Bryant and Garnett for sure and possibly Wade and LeBron?). I think once the players faced the possibility of having to go find a real job, one that only pays $30-$60K a year, I think they would sign in a minute.

...I like the new ultimate idea....but what McDonalds or KFC pays 30 grand a year....even for a manager??? Besides, most fast food places have "ink" policies that would disqualify about 80 percent of the players!
 
I'm no lawyer or anything, and I could be wrong, but I have a hard time believing the courts would let that happen, just my opinion.

I think you're probably right, but how do the owners not have this option? If I start a small business and later shut it down due to losses, can my ex-employees sue me for damages? Can the courts step in and force me to remain in business? Of course not. How is this any different?
 
I don't think the owners would do this but I might be tempted to go and watch some scabs play the sport that I love. (at a reduced rate of course) but I. Was thinking it might be kind of fun to discuss who we would pay to see play. (on a second thought this isn't a strike so scabs could never happen this is a lockout)

Lance Allred
Jayce Carroll
Travis Hansen
Hafa araujo

To name a few

The players aren't striking, so if the NBA opened their doors they would have to honor the contracts with the rest of the NBA players.

Now if it were the players striking instead of being locked out the NBA could hire replacement players.

Maybe we can get some Scab owners to fill in, and they could play in some other arena's. If they did that would the players pay the scab owners?
 
I think you're probably right, but how do the owners not have this option? If I start a small business and later shut it down due to losses, can my ex-employees sue me for damages? Can the courts step in and force me to remain in business? Of course not. How is this any different?
Owners of teams for the NBA is much different then your small business with no unions. A small business losing money has a reason to shut down, what reason do multi billionaires not so much. If there reason is to scare the players I don't think the courts would be amused.
 
If the season does get cancelled AND all current contracts voided, we might see the equivalent of an "expansion draft" consisting of any players, past or PRESENT, who want to participate. Maybe have the owners agree to re-activate the players old contract they had with their old team when picking them. If a player is too pricey for them, pick someone else. Lebron & Wade & Co prefer to not participate, fine. Essentially all teams starting from scratch, then have the draft in June as usual.
This from another site:

"The players have painted themselves into a corner. The courts are not going to save them.
Once the season is cancelled, I expect the NBA to take swift and decisive action, to institute a set of rules, a draft and a season for next year. Then, they will look for a group of players willing to accept those rules, form a union, get recognized and have everything in place for June.
I think the players have misjudged the NBA horribly.
Sorry if there’s no games this year, but in the long term, this may end up better, especially for small market teams. "
 
If the season does get cancelled AND all current contracts voided, we might see the equivalent of an "expansion draft" consisting of any players, past or PRESENT, who want to participate. Maybe have the owners agree to re-activate the players old contract they had with their old team when picking them. If a player is too pricey for them, pick someone else. Lebron & Wade & Co prefer to not participate, fine. Essentially all teams starting from scratch, then have the draft in June as usual.
This from another site:

"The players have painted themselves into a corner. The courts are not going to save them.
Once the season is cancelled, I expect the NBA to take swift and decisive action, to institute a set of rules, a draft and a season for next year. Then, they will look for a group of players willing to accept those rules, form a union, get recognized and have everything in place for June.
I think the players have misjudged the NBA horribly.
Sorry if there’s no games this year, but in the long term, this may end up better, especially for small market teams. "

If this does happen I kinda want the same jazz team.
 
In this scenario, I would think teams would try to sign their former "core" players first, just because they know them. If teams automatically get their old players back, contracts of many top players would almost surely have to be renegotiated to fit under the new hard cap. This could be a real "sore" spot... Maybe it'll be that they can keep "X" number of their old players, then there'd be an "expansion" draft from all remaining players, with new contracts.
Whatever, they do, it's bound to be contraversial...
 
Back
Top