What's new
By:

Serious quesiton for people who deny human involvement in climate change/global warming

b4bw0yiciaapjqb.png
 
babe said:
Actually, I favor these efforts to compensate for known inaccuracies in the data, but at the same time it shows the problems we face in invoking this data as the basis for major decisions and long-range plans. I still don't see data that justifies the regulations and social policies some want to emplace.

Ten or twenty year spikes in temp have been demonstrated in analyzing sediment cores and ice cores as a prelude to each known "ice age". Before we take drastic actions, we need to figure out what causes ice ages, which do not correlate to sudden changes in ambient atmospheric CO2.
Click to expand...

Not sure what's the best way to respond to this soooo....I'm gunna go with graph.
/
icecore_records.jpg

Ice_Age_Temperature.png
 
ElRoach0 said:
So, I was browsing reddit, and found this link:

https://i.imgur.com/pLFblKg.jpg

And I lulled, and lulled, and lulled...
Click to expand...

Back in the day when actual intellects who were honest with themselves frequently posted here, I shredded one of the 900+ page UN IPCC reports.

I'm sure you haven't read a single page of any of them, and you certainly do not have any scientific background if you buy into this type of pseudo-science that's meant for nothing more than political attempts at subverting publications in true peer reviewed journals.

It is a panel, a god that you worship because they are the final word and say because P-A-N-E-L. I'm sure you clapped like a baby as you lulled, and lulled, and lulled...
 
franklin said:
Back in the day when actual intellects who were honest with themselves frequently posted here, I shredded one of the 900+ page UN IPCC reports.

I'm sure you haven't read a single page of any of them, and you certainly do not have any scientific background if you buy into this type of pseudo-science that's meant for nothing more than political attempts at subverting publications in true peer reviewed journals.

It is a panel, a god that you worship because they are the final word and say because P-A-N-E-L. I'm sure you clapped like a baby as you lulled, and lulled, and lulled...
Click to expand...

You never existed in that day. You're a nobody that trolled a few people into your own strawman arguments that don't stand up, but took the initiative to accuse them of it first.

You're a liar, and a transparent troll that insists on going completely with, or completely against the grain quite literally on a whim. Whatever suits your fancy that moment.

You're a frickin garter snake, F-troupe. Now go play with your husband before he starts seeing trout on the side.
 
ElRoach0 said:
You never existed in that day. You're a nobody that trolled a few people into your own strawman arguments that don't stand up, but took the initiative to accuse them of it first.

You're a liar, and a transparent troll that insists on going completely with, or completely against the grain quite literally on a whim. Whatever suits your fancy that moment.

You're a frickin garter snake, F-troupe. Now go play with your husband before he starts seeing trout on the side.
Click to expand...
:^O
 
ElRoach0 said:
You never existed in that day. You're a nobody that trolled a few people into your own strawman arguments that don't stand up, but took the initiative to accuse them of it first.

You're a liar, and a transparent troll that insists on going completely with, or completely against the grain quite literally on a whim. Whatever suits your fancy that moment.

You're a frickin garter snake, F-troupe. Now go play with your husband before he starts seeing trout on the side.
Click to expand...

Oh no, did somebody piss on your bible? This post would be less pathetic if you actually read the reports like I do.

Hyper religious people are obnoxious.
 
franklin said:
Oh no, did somebody piss on your bible? This post would be less pathetic if you actually read the reports like I do.

Hyper religious people are obnoxious.
Click to expand...

Hahaha. Not something I ever expected someone to call Roach.
 
Stoked said:
Hahaha. Not something I ever expected someone to call Roach.
Click to expand...

Religiosity goes FAR deeper than Bible thumping. It seems to be an extremely common aberration in human cognition (which suggests it was evolutionary advantageous).

Have you ever tried talking a hippie out of her "I need these crystals to cleanse my body of toxins" style of faith? It is just as impossible as trying to reason with the hardcorist of fundamentalist Christians.
 
Siro said:
Religiosity goes FAR deeper than Bible thumping. It seems to be an extremely common aberration in human cognition (which suggests it was evolutionary advantageous).

Have you ever tried talking a hippie out of her "I need these crystals to cleanse my body of toxins" style of faith? It is just as impossible as trying to reason with the hardcorist of fundamentalist Christians.
Click to expand...

I know it does. Usually the term spiritual is applied to those that believe in something more but are not part of a religion.

Either way it's not something I thought I'd hear Roach called. Just made me laugh is all.
 
Stoked said:
I know it does. Usually the term spiritual is applied to those that believe in something more but are not part of a religion.

Either way it's not something I thought I'd hear Roach called. Just made me laugh is all.
Click to expand...

You're missing the mark. Much of humanity is religious even if not spiritual at all. Think of your upbringing and what community means to you. Community is religious but not spiritual. It's what you are, what you want to be, who want to impress by your lifestyle and not be embarrassed for.

That's a rather generic example but the extensions are obvious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top