Should Obama stop this?

[One Brow]

But we wouldn't want to accept those cures, because the drug companies wouldn't make much money off of a natural cure would they?

Drug company executives get cancer, as do their parents and spouses. If there was a cure, they'd make sure it was available, and find a way to make money on it.

Susan Summers wrote a book a couple years ago highlighting her fight with cancer, and how she beat it without radiation and surgery.

When 100 people take a natural cure, and 99 of them die (as opposed to the 50 or so who would survive taking medicine), woo-meisters points to the lone survivor and claim they were cured.

Their are cures all over over the place, but that is just one example of a mainstream type book.

https://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2009/10/suzanne_somers_has_just_carpet_bombed_th.php

Suzanne Somers had a Stage I tumor reated by surgery (you know, "Western" medicine).

 

[One Brow]

All diseases are cases of nutrient deficiency, and therefore can be cured by instilling those nutrients back into the body.

When someone gets cancer, it is because the bodies cells have shifted too far to the side of acidic as opposed to the natural alkaline.
Now AIDS is one case where I haven't researched much, but cancer and Alzheimers is a different story. Alzheimers is the case of brain cells slowly dying off from age and not talking better care of your brain in general.
People like Jack LaLanne never suffered from this because of his extremely healthy lifestyle and juicing of course.

There is so much nonsense in that post, and so much of it disproven, that it's hard to maikntain my composure.

A flu virus doesn't care how healthy you are, it invades you cells using a specific biochemical pathway that operates the same in all people, regardless of health. People with cancer do not have more acidic bodies (whatever that is supposed to mean) than those who do not. Alzheimer propensity has been tied to a number of factor, none of them juicing. You've fallen for decptions and bad thinking, wrapped up in a pretty package that gives you the illusion of control.

 

[One Brow]

I also wanted to bring up the vaccine argument, as if you knew how they made it.... you wouldn't want it in your body.

I get every vaccine in the schedule, and make sure my kids do as well. I do know how they are made, and don't rely on anti-vaccine organizations for my information.

However, I understand that freeloaders such as yourself can rely on most of the USA vaccinating their kids, so you don't have to. Just be careful which foreign countries you visit.

 

[TroutBum]

I get every vaccine in the schedule, and make sure my kids do as well. I do know how they are made, and don't rely on anti-vaccine organizations for my information.

However, I understand that freeloaders such as yourself can rely on most of the USA vaccinating their kids, so you don't have to. Just be careful which foreign countries you visit.

I agree with your *** raping of Mr. Juicer's comments, but I do want to know where you stand on people (real people, not nut job twits like TheSilencer) that are against getting vaccines, flu shots, etc.?

 

[One Brow]

I agree with your *** raping of Mr. Juicer's comments, but I do want to know where you stand on people (real people, not nut job twits like TheSilencer) that are against getting vaccines, flu shots, etc.?

A vaccine (such as a flu shot) protects not only you, but every immune-compromised person you encounter. It's every but as much a personal responsibility to get one as it is to stay home from work when you have a cold, as an example.

 

[Gameface]

A vaccine (such as a flu shot) protects not only you, but every immune-compromised person you encounter. It's every but as much a personal responsibility to get one as it is to stay home from work when you have a cold, as an example.

I disagree.

I typically get vaccines and while in the Navy I got a butt-ton of vaccines for all sorts of stuff. I could have opted out of things like the anthrax vaccine, but was happy to get it. Anyway, if someone is concerned about side-effects and bad reactions I think they have every right to skip a vaccine. They don't owe it to me and my family to get a vaccine. People should be able to choose if they want to take their chances with a virus that cannot be completely controlled or predicted vs taking a vaccine that might have unknown consequences.

Just like with climate change, the "scientific community" will allow no dissention on this point. There is no room for questioning their assertion that vaccines are safe. And when they say vaccines are safe they mean that fewer people will suffer from side effects from vaccines than would suffer from the flu, as an example. They are not saying that vaccines never hurt anyone. Some people would rather play in a lightning storm than play Russian Roulette, even if the gun has half a million barrels.

 

[One Brow]

I disagree.

I typically get vaccines and while in the Navy I got a butt-ton of vaccines for all sorts of stuff. I could have opted out of things like the anthrax vaccine, but was happy to get it. Anyway, if someone is concerned about side-effects and bad reactions I think they have every right to skip a vaccine. They don't owe it to me and my family to get a vaccine. People should be able to choose if they want to take their chances with a virus that cannot be completely controlled or predicted vs taking a vaccine that might have unknown consequences.

Just like with climate change, the "scientific community" will allow no dissention on this point. There is no room for questioning their assertion that vaccines are safe. And when they say vaccines are safe they mean that fewer people will suffer from side effects from vaccines than would suffer from the flu, as an example. They are not saying that vaccines never hurt anyone. Some people would rather play in a lightning storm than play Russian Roulette, even if the gun has half a million barrels.

You said you disagreed, but I am uncertain as to the point of disagreement. I offered a very specific exmaple of staying home from work when you have a cold for a comparison. You coluld rewrite your post almost line-for-line on that same issue (as I did below). The only issue of disagreement, and I don't think you may have felt this way, was the comparison of "lightning storm" and "Russian roulette", when a more apt comparison would have been "lightning storm"(unvaccinated) and "mumblety-peg" (vaccinated). Perhaps you thought "personal responsibility" meant choice was not involved? Everyone chooses which of their responsibilities to their communities they will live up to, but vaccination is one of them. It protects others, not just the person being vaccinated.

Anyway, if someone is concerned about deadlines and losing sick time I think they have every right to go into work. They don't owe it to me and my family to stay home. People should be able to choose if they want to take their chances with a contagion threat that cannot be completely controlled or predicted vs staying home for an indefinite period of time.

Just like with climate change, the "scientific community" will allow no dissention on this point. There is no room for questioning their assertion that working sick spreads disease. And when they say diseases spread they mean that fewer people will contract the disease in my home than would contract the disease at my workplace, as an example. They are not saying that the people I live with would never get sick from my staying home. Some people would rather risk infecting their coworkers than risk infecting their family.

 

[franklin]

Backwhen I worked at Anthem, they sent out a series of company-wide emails discussing the 7 reasons for rising costs. It's been a while, but aging was #1, innovation #3 or 4. This was back in the days of Clinton.

Finally getting around to responding to this...

If age is the main driver of rising costs then I fail to see why it's viewed as such an economic distress signal. For starters, the older are by and large the wealthy class. They've also always had to deal with higher costs to maintain health. How does increasing the number of, say, 50+ individuals strain anything at the micro level any more than in the past?

As older citizens are wealthier on average, this proves a great driver of economic growth and healthy wealth transfer to the younger generation as they're able to work for what they receive at reasonable wages.

 

[Scat]

If age is the main driver of rising costs then I fail to see why it's viewed as such an economic distress signal. For starters, the older are by and large the wealthy class. They've also always had to deal with higher costs to maintain health. How does increasing the number of, say, 50+ individuals strain anything at the micro level any more than in the past?

As older citizens are wealthier on average, this proves a great driver of economic growth and healthy wealth transfer to the younger generation as they're able to work for what they receive at reasonable wages.

Except for that at the age of 65 these wealthy, older individuals, for the most part, are no longer paying for their health care. It is we younger, less wealthy individuals via our taxes through Medicare. It is only elective surgeries such as face lifts, lipo and Lasix that they pay out of pocket.

 

[TheSilencer1313]

Millions are allergic to corn, wheat, peanuts, tree nuts, pollen, bee stings, milk, eggs, fish, soy, fruit, cats, dogs, mold, metals, and male reproductive fluid.

You're probably against chemically extracted iodine too, but have a bottle of iodide crystals on the shelf of your bunker just in case of nuclear fallout.

I'd run off and find a chart of life expectancy correlated with chemical processing, but I have this pressing puzzle:

Why do you have the key number of the illuminati in your username TWICE? I'm starting to suspect you as a false flag disinformation agent. How much are the Rockefeller foundations paying you? You CFR, that it?

Haha this is awesome. I wish I was getting paid by the Rockefeller's.......
I hate the CFR completely, and I'm just a dude that works and goes home.
I can tell your giving me ****, and don't take anything seriously anyway.....

 

[TroutBum]

A vaccine (such as a flu shot) protects not only you, but every immune-compromised person you encounter. It's every but as much a personal responsibility to get one as it is to stay home from work when you have a cold, as an example.

I got one flu shot and it made me sicker than I've ever been. I'm never getting another one. I am all about my fellow man, but my fellow man can kiss my fellow *** -- I'm never going through that **** again.

 

[Duck Rodgers]

Haha this is awesome. I wish I was getting paid by the Rockefeller's.......
I hate the CFR completely, and I'm just a dude that works and goes home.
I can tell your giving me ****, and don't take anything seriously anyway.....

Is that your picture in your avatar? If so, you do kind of have that Madame Blavatsky/Theosophical society vibe going on.