What's new
By:

Should we go full rebuild?

Should we go full rebuild?

  • Total voters
    83
Tanktastic said:
An honest conversation would probably be what everyone thinks should happen. Though explaining tanking like Lauri has never heard of it and doesn't understand the concept does sound like an awful idea.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's not what I meant.

If I were Lauri I wouldn't be on board, so I wouldn't blame him for not wanting to go that route. I also don't think the FO is obligated to discuss strategy with the players.

This is why even though I can see this as an attractive route as a fan, I'm not sure I can see it actually happening or working.
 
Unless there is an immediate one piece away contender who can give Lauri the max I'm not worried about losing him.

Utah is a great situation that wants him to be one of their main pieces. Utah will have cap space and assets moving forward.
 
KqWIN said:
<...>
Having said that, I also don’t believe in wasting a player’s prime nor do I believe with trying to compete for a half a year only to quit and tank for the other half. By doing this, the Jazz have essentially limited the rewards for trying to win or lose. The goal for winning is the play in. The goal for tanking is to get the 9th pick. Not a ton of reward either way.
Click to expand...
That's it.
It's fairly obvious decisions have piled up not in a good way.
 
No, I don't think so.

But we should probably get rid of all of the non-Lauri and non-Dunn veteran rotation players. I love Sexton but I do not think he and Keyonte can co-exist defensively.
 
There is a guy on the Hornets that would unlock us at point with great passing ability and alot more. Lauri would excel playing alongside him on the court.
 
jumpin bean said:
There is a guy on the Hornets that would unlock us at point with great passing ability and alot more. Lauri would excel playing alongside him on the court.
Click to expand...
If the three rooks make huge strides next year, maybe not, but if it’s minimal or just Key then he’ll yes 100% they should.
 
I was originally "leaning no", but am becoming increasingly in favor of a full rebuild.

Just listened to the new Duncd On where they ranked young cores, and while I don't agree with everything it is a good reminder of how primed so many teams are right now. It's easy to overrate your own pieces. Depending on how the draft lottery goes, I am becoming increasingly in favor of genuinely fielding Lauri offers. I think a Thunder second round collapse is the best case scenario for a high price offer.
 
Jaanipoeg said:
I was originally "leaning no", but am becoming increasingly in favor of a full rebuild.

Just listened to the new Duncd On where they ranked young cores, and while I don't agree with everything it is a good reminder of how primed so many teams are right now. It's easy to overrate your own pieces. Depending on how the draft lottery goes, I am becoming increasingly in favor of genuinely fielding Lauri offers. I think a Thunder second round collapse is the best case scenario for a high price offer.
Click to expand...
How about a first round collapse to the rockets?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Jaanipoeg said:
I was originally "leaning no", but am becoming increasingly in favor of a full rebuild.

Just listened to the new Duncd On where they ranked young cores, and while I don't agree with everything it is a good reminder of how primed so many teams are right now. It's easy to overrate your own pieces. Depending on how the draft lottery goes, I am becoming increasingly in favor of genuinely fielding Lauri offers. I think a Thunder second round collapse is the best case scenario for a high price offer.
Click to expand...
No interest in trading him. But if we do OKC isn't on the list to trade to. They are going to be good for awhile and those picks are useless. Trade him to like Pistons who could get him and still suck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top