What's new
By:

So gay!!!

Sirkickyass said:
Wait, what?

What does this mean? Would you breathe water? Would you do it in anti-gravity? How can sex have a total opposite?
Click to expand...

Really? The sexual organs of a woman and a man are as pretty much as opposite as it gets. If I could draw you some pictures on here I would. I also think your dad should be giving you this talk and not me.
 
What is it gays want out of this exactly?

1. Death and disability benefits from social security?

2. The ability to file joint tax returns?

3. More food stamps?

4. Dramatic divorce proceedings and alimony?

Those kinda things? Money?
 
Beantown said:
Really? The sexual organs of a woman and a man are as pretty much as opposite as it gets. If I could draw you some pictures on here I would. I also think your dad should be giving you this talk and not me.
Click to expand...
You're 100% wrong here. You claim biology as your witness and you're dead wrong...
All of the sex organs between a man and a woman are homologous.
 
Hopper said:
What is it gays want out of this exactly?

1. Death and disability benefits from social security?

2. The ability to file joint tax returns?

3. More food stamps?

4. Dramatic divorce proceedings and alimony?

Those kinda things? Money?
Click to expand...

Probably the same things that heterosexuals want when they get married: the ability to proclaim that they, too, are in long-lasting, real relationships and love each other enough to spend their lives together.
 
chemdude1232 said:
Probably the same things that heterosexuals want when they get married: the ability to proclaim that they, too, are in long-lasting, real relationships and love each other enough to spend their lives together.
Click to expand...

Well, I guess every person might have different motives. Personally, I see no reason for anybody to get married, unless they have kids. It seems to me that the only real reason the State gets involved in "personal romances" to begin with is for the sake of the children involved and it's interest in stable, healthy conditions for children.
 
Hopper said:
Well, I guess every person might have different motives. Personally, I see no reason for anybody to get married, unless they have kids. It seems to me that the only real reason the State gets involved in "personal romances" to begin with is for the sake of the children involved and it's interest in stable, healthy conditions for children.
Click to expand...

Ahh Hopper...plenty of heterosexual couples choose not to have kids either. Should their marriages be dissolved?
 
chemdude1232 said:
Ahh Hopper...plenty of heterosexual couples choose not to have kids either. Should their marriages be dissolved?
Click to expand...

No, Chem, but I'm just talking about State involvement really. Anybody who want to go through some religious or secular "ceremony" where they publicly declare their eternal love for each other should be free too. It's the State intervention and "entitlements" that I'm addressing.
 
Beantown said:
That doesnt change the fact that only heteorsexual relations were given the power to procreate through natural selection.
Click to expand...

That doesn't change the fact that natural selection also created homosexuality. It's here to stay, Bean. Why not just let them get hitched?
 
I just have a few things to say on this. First I'm very pleased with the ruling today. I just hope that if this makes it the Supreme Court, they too will come to the same decision.

Now I'm heading up to the state capital to celebrate this decision with a few hundred other people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top