What's new
By:

Spurs offering George Hill?

Hmm I think this deserves a good hard look. I'm not sure of him backing up Harris, since he isn't really a distributor, but he is a reliable defender against guards and a somewhat reliable shooter. He would be a solid rotation player for us. I agree with most of the above, it depends who is available at 12.
 
If you're trading with the Spurs, chances are you're going to end up losing in the deal.
 
This would also give us a solid veteran/winner instead of yet another rookie. We have enough young players especially with the 3rd pick. I think Hill could be our starting pg, assuming we move Harris. If the Spurs really have been open to moving Parker, that shows you how highly they think of Hill.
 
sportsnut1232 said:
Only because they will find the diamond in the rough at 12. I do not have faith that we will find a player at 12 better than Hill, so let them win.
Click to expand...

If the Jazz are set on drafting Singleton, I absolutely agree.

And I would actually bet money that if the Spurs did end up with #12, they sure as hell wouldn't be drafting Singleton.
 
I don't want to find out the deal also included Bell. But there's too many variables to know if it would have been the right move.
 
I like Hill but I would be more interested in seeing what Utah has in store with the 12 pick with either a differrent trade or by drafting Jimmer. Jimmer > Hill in my eyes!
 
and Billshelby brought up Bell do we see Bell being movd for a 2nd rounder? Maybe 1 of the Lakers 4 2nd Roundrs?
 
P.S. 2.5 assists in 28 MPG and posts a <2:1 ast:to ratio. Maybe I'm stubborn, but I want a little more out of my PG.
 
NUMBERICA said:
P.S. 2.5 assists in 28 MPG and posts a <2:1 ast:to ratio. Maybe I'm stubborn, but I want a little more out of my PG.
Click to expand...

Yeah what I said. But he doesn't really turn the ball over either. The ratio is bad cause his assist # is bad
 
MDAV28 said:
Yeah what I said. But he doesn't really turn the ball over either. The ratio is bad cause his assist # is bad
Click to expand...

Right. You could say his ratio could be a lot better because of that, or you could say with one more turnover per game, he's barely breaking even in that regard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top