The burden of proof shouldn’t change based on what is at stake.
There is a lower burden of proof in a civil case than a criminal case. This is not even a judicial proceeding.
The burden of proof shouldn’t change based on what is at stake.
You guys are unbelievable. Like this woman is going to make her life a living hell over a lie.
And now she’s not gonna talk. Lovely.
What a mess.
Only real question remaining imo is if this swayed Murkowski and the other 2-3 senators that remain undecided.
I just got done doing several interviews for a new job. You think they should have needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I wasn't qualified in order to not hire me? What?The burden of proof shouldn’t change based on what is at stake.
WTF is wrong with you? Of course you would remember a dude pinning you down, gagging you and trying to rip your clothes off. Everything else is irrelevant.
You talk as if you think her goal is to get this over with. She is a hero to the left for obstructing. At every turn you can now expect her to take the least expedient path. Both sides have become experts at doing this to each other.I would imagine her not talking isn’t going to help her case.
Again, what a mess.
I hope she does change her mind. She’s already gone this far, might as well finish it.