What's new

"Surprised if Teague Doesn't End Up in Utah"

They should be trying to move Hayward. Hood is the future.

That's like saying trade Rudy Gobert because Trey Lyles is the future. Or like saying trade Michael Jordan because Scotia Pippin is the future.

Why can't we have both?

btw, nobody is on the same page with you about Hayward being a scrub. Why do you think he gets invites to USA basketball? How do you explain him actually being a good player? He can't be a scrub and a good player. When he's on the court he plays good. How do you explain that?
 
I don't think we spend assets on a Teague rental. I think the Jazz will try to get Schroder. If they can't they will pass.

Why on earth would we try to trade for Schroeder while our need is for experience and leadership at the PG position ???? Gee potential always has fans in knots. The jazz is loaded with kids, another one isn't the right move.
 
Why on earth would we try to trade for Schroeder while our need is for experience and leadership at the PG position ???? Gee potential always has fans in knots. The jazz is loaded with kids, another one isn't the right move.

Because he's a young player with a lot more upside who can grow with the team for a long time to come.
 
I don't think Teague's age or experience are working against him, as far as the Jazz's FO is concerned. Don't know if those were factors in your reasoning, however.

It's where he's at with his contract not necessarily his age. He only has 1 more year on an 8 million dollar contract. At which point the FO will have to decide to pay him and make decisions about the guys we have now a year early or let him go for nothin. I don't see the FO giving up assets to put themselves in that situation.
 
Why on earth would we try to trade for Schroeder while our need is for experience and leadership at the PG position ???? Gee potential always has fans in knots. The jazz is loaded with kids, another one isn't the right move.

I agree that going after Schroeder isn't the right call, but that's not really the logic you use for that. If we could go after Karl Towns, you do it. Who gives a rats *** what age he is?

I'm not as impressed with Schroeder as other people are. He's ok.

I like Exum more than Schroeder, and I don't even like Exum all that much
 
It's where he's at with his contract not his age. He only has 1 more year on an 8 million dollar contract. At which point the FO will have to decide to pay him and make decisions about the guys we have now a year early or let him go for nothin. I don't see the FO giving up assets to put themselves in that situation.

But wouldn't that be the case with any FA? Contracts are pretty short nowadays.
 
Because he's a young player with a lot more upside who can grow with the team for a long time to come.

But to grow this team needs to learn how to play better, to have some leadership around, to have players who have seen what playoffs are, etc... upside is great and all (if it materialises btw) but it's not what this team needs. Sure getting a surefire supertar would be great, but piling up "young promising players"... We have 6/7 of those already !

Teague brings you the experience of a deep run in the POs last year, of playing for a team who knows how to play, etc...
 
Back
Top