We have some flexibility this offseason. Here is a look at how some popular options might play out in our actual rotations.
Here are a couple of assumptions:
1. We are going to keep Exum in all circumstances
2. Any rookies we get this year won't break the rotation
3. Neto isn't likely to be back. His roster spot will go to rookies.
4. O'Neale has earned a rotation spot
First if roll it back, keep all of our optional players and retain Favors and Exum.
Rubio 32 / Exum 16
Mitchell 34 / Exum 6 / O'Neale 8
Ingles 30 / O'Neale 18
Favors 16 / Crowder 32
Gobert 32 / Favors 16
This is a very good defensive lineup. But we have severe shot creation limitations. We also have good depth at most positions with Sefolosha, Jerebko and Udoh.
Next if we manage to pry Bjelica away from Minnesota and let Favors go. We may need to cut Jerebko to free up enough money for Bjelica.
Rubio 32 / Exum 16
Mitchell 34 / Exum 6 / O'Neale 8
Ingles 30 / O'Neale 14 / Crowder 4
Crowder 24 / Bjelica 24
Gobert 32 / Udoh or Bradley 16
I think we are really going to miss Favors contribution as a back up center. But Bjelica's shooting and passing could improve our overall offensive abilities. I expect we would be nearly as good defensively and but slightly improved offensively.
The last option I consider was signing Jerami Grant. As an unrestricted FA we would have a better chance of signing him. We would have to let Favors go. But we could potentially keep everyone else.
Rubio 32 / Exum 16
Mitchell 34 / Exum 6 / O'Neale 8
Ingles 30 / O'Neale 18
Crowder 30 / Grant 14 / Sefolosha 4
Gobert 32 / Grant 16
Our backup lineups with Grant at the 5 and Exum at the 1 could potentially switch 1-5. I also believe in our player development to help Grant take another step forward. I see this lines as have the most long term potential. The real downside is we would be small team and vulnerable to offensive rebounding.
So which option would you pick? Or do you favor more change in the rotations? Other free agents?
Here are a couple of assumptions:
1. We are going to keep Exum in all circumstances
2. Any rookies we get this year won't break the rotation
3. Neto isn't likely to be back. His roster spot will go to rookies.
4. O'Neale has earned a rotation spot
First if roll it back, keep all of our optional players and retain Favors and Exum.
Rubio 32 / Exum 16
Mitchell 34 / Exum 6 / O'Neale 8
Ingles 30 / O'Neale 18
Favors 16 / Crowder 32
Gobert 32 / Favors 16
This is a very good defensive lineup. But we have severe shot creation limitations. We also have good depth at most positions with Sefolosha, Jerebko and Udoh.
Next if we manage to pry Bjelica away from Minnesota and let Favors go. We may need to cut Jerebko to free up enough money for Bjelica.
Rubio 32 / Exum 16
Mitchell 34 / Exum 6 / O'Neale 8
Ingles 30 / O'Neale 14 / Crowder 4
Crowder 24 / Bjelica 24
Gobert 32 / Udoh or Bradley 16
I think we are really going to miss Favors contribution as a back up center. But Bjelica's shooting and passing could improve our overall offensive abilities. I expect we would be nearly as good defensively and but slightly improved offensively.
The last option I consider was signing Jerami Grant. As an unrestricted FA we would have a better chance of signing him. We would have to let Favors go. But we could potentially keep everyone else.
Rubio 32 / Exum 16
Mitchell 34 / Exum 6 / O'Neale 8
Ingles 30 / O'Neale 18
Crowder 30 / Grant 14 / Sefolosha 4
Gobert 32 / Grant 16
Our backup lineups with Grant at the 5 and Exum at the 1 could potentially switch 1-5. I also believe in our player development to help Grant take another step forward. I see this lines as have the most long term potential. The real downside is we would be small team and vulnerable to offensive rebounding.
So which option would you pick? Or do you favor more change in the rotations? Other free agents?