What's new
By:

The answer to the question that EVERYBODY has been asking me!

Jeffersuck had SEVEN blocks two games ago. Boozer, in 14 games, has FIVE.

I also wanted to point to this awesome stat line from the Christmas day game: 26 points, 19 rebounds -- NICE -- wait, he had to take 25 shots to get to 26 points? Wait, he had 7 turnover's? Only 1 assist? That's right, he took 25 shots and only assisted one time. Only got to the line 3 times? Impressive for a PF.

Boy, he's awesome.
 
TroutBum said:
Jeffersuck had SEVEN blocks two games ago. Boozer, in 14 games, has FIVE.

I also wanted to point to this awesome stat line from the Christmas day game: 26 points, 19 rebounds -- NICE -- wait, he had to take 25 shots to get to 26 points? Wait, he had 7 turnover's? Only 1 assist? That's right, he took 25 shots and only assisted one time. Only got to the line 3 times? Impressive for a PF.

Boy, he's awesome.
Click to expand...

And he should have had three more points, but the refs took away what should have been an AND ONE and called an offensive foul. The Knicks player was clearly inside of the circle. One assist in one game? So what, he's a power forward, assists are mainly for PG's and SF's. Rebounds are for PF's. Duh.

And blocks are quickly becoming one of the most overrated stats on this board. It's like, "OMG JEFFERSON HAD SEVEN BLOCKS...MVP!!!! Yeah he can block better than Carlos, Boozer does most everything else better.
 
Sloanfeld said:
And he should have had three more points, but the refs took away what should have been an AND ONE and called an offensive foul. The Knicks player was clearly inside of the circle. One assist in one game? So what, he's a power forward, assists are mainly for PG's and SF's. Rebounds are for PF's. Duh.

And blocks are quickly becoming one of the most overrated stats on this board. It's like, "OMG JEFFERSON HAD SEVEN BLOCKS...MVP!!!! Yeah he can block better than Carlos, Boozer does most everything else better.
Click to expand...

Nice, blaming the refs as a last resort. Typical loser mentality and nothing less than what is expected from you.
 
Sloanfeld said:
I don't know what you are talking about. From what I've read, he did want to be here. It was KOC in June 2009 who said to him that the team was looking to go in another direction.
Click to expand...

First, not sure if this is an attempt at sarcasm, but I am going for the you are really serious about this angle. And I am in the mood for ranting anyway. So bear with me. :)

---------------------

Here is Boozer's exact quote from ESPN:

"I'm opting out. No matter what, I'm going to get a raise regardless," Boozer told ESPN.com. "I am going to opt out, I don't see why I wouldn't, I think it's a very good business decision for me and my family, but I'd also like to see what happens with the Jazz and stay here."

I do like that he threw in the "like to see what happens with the Jazz" crap at the end. It is not exactly a huge confidence builder on your team when one of your star players says in the middle of the year that he is opting out.

Interesting thing is, if he really wanted to stay with Utah all he had to do was NOT OPT OUT. He throws away the $12.6 mill he could earn by SIMPLY AGREEING TO STAY WITH THE JAZZ and instead states unequivocally that he is opting out...a mere oh 9 months before he can.

Opting out means it is his choice and his choice alone to run the risk of leaving. If he seriously thought KOC was going to jump for joy and his opting out and offer him a much larger contract than he already had guaranteed then he was not thinking about the "business decision" he forced the Jazz into by opting out. If he wanted to stay here he would have lobbied for an extension, and thereby a raise, from the Jazz. Instead "I am opting out".

NOT opting out means he stays, guaranteed. Yeah sounds like he sure wants to be here and it is all KOC's fault. Give me a break.
 
Last edited:
Well he felt that he had earned a raise from the Jazz, that's why he said it. The comment was a little cocky, but I have no problem with it. Obviously the front office didn't feel that he was worth more than what Chicago did.
 
TroutBum said:
Nice, blaming the refs as a last resort. Typical loser mentality and nothing less than what is expected from you.
Click to expand...

I blamed the refs for one play. They clearly showed it on replay and the broadcasters agreed that it was a bad call. I guess you didn't watch the game. I don't care though, just making a point. I wanted the Kincks to win.

All this Boozer hate, coming from the guy who loves AK.
 
The answer to the question "everyone asks you" is

"Yes I am an absolute moron. Thanks for asking"

another suitable answer is

"No, I did not graduate from middle school."

one more

"Yes, my life is the epitome of epic-fail."
 
Sloanfeld said:
Well he felt that he had earned a raise from the Jazz, that's why he said it. The comment was a little cocky, but I have no problem with it. Obviously the front office didn't feel that he was worth more than what Chicago did.
Click to expand...

I was laughing my *** off reading your posts... up until this pathetic burp. Any pure "business decision" Boozer would have made would require him to stay in Utah, without all the moving expenses, and with the largest raise possible. He didn't get the maximum contract from the Bulls, regardless sweetie. It wasn't about business.
 
LunaticWolf said:
Honestly, he is trolling no less than the Boozer haters.

He has a good point too.
Click to expand...

hahahahahahaha This from the guy that was going to keep game to game stats last year to prove Loozer was an above average defender. TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Funny
 
The-Joker said:
The answer to the question "everyone asks you" is

"Yes I am an absolute moron. Thanks for asking"

another suitable answer is

"No, I did not graduate from middle school."

one more

"Yes, my life is the epitome of epic-fail."
Click to expand...

THIS! A hundred times over you Loozer Lover.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top