What's new
By:

The Battle Begins

Millsapa said:
So you are equating Christians to conservatives?
Click to expand...

Do you practice non-sequturs at night before you go to bed? Obviously the progressive who invoked Jesus were Christians.

Millsapa said:
Liberals use the language of science (consensus "science") to persuade people to put their horrific ideas into law.
Click to expand...

Eugenicists, who were racists of both liberal and conservative persuation, used scientific-sounding language yo put horrific ideas into law. Why did you exclude conservatives while implicating all liberals, except to mislead?
 
Millsapa said:
Nice to hear that from you, but why would you consider it a tragedy if you think it is just a mass of cells?
Click to expand...

I think you're just a mass of cells, but it would still be a tragedy if someone killed you. I also think I'm just a mass of cells, but I'm not so sure of the tragedy if I'm killed.
 
One Brow said:
If eugenics had not been available, hitler would have used politics, religion, or whatever else was handy. People love being given rationalization for the hate they already possess. No sense blaiming the ratinalization.
Click to expand...

Eugenicists, and their pseudoscience, were directly responsible for the death of millions.
"Doctors would create the science, devise the eugenic formulas, and even hand-select the victims for sterilization, euthanasia and mass extermination."
This is another reason I'm opposed to socialized medicine. I know bad liberal ideas never die.
 
One Brow said:
The majority of scientists are monotheists, yet you never hear monotheism as being consensus science. Nor is Chriton any more correct the second time around. Scientific consensus comes after the results are in, not before.
Click to expand...

The whole reason consensus is invoked is because there is no reproducible results. Darwiniacs, Warmites, Eugenicists all fit into this category.
 
After digging into Cain a bit, I must say he is very likeable to me. Too bad he has the huge black mark of being black.......er......I mean......being former chairman of the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank because I really enjoyed doing some youtubing of him and watching/listening to some of his interviews/speeches. Love the rhetoric. But bankster connections with seemingly no desire to separate himself from them? I can't go there. Definitely can see why he is making some noise though, and if I was forced to vote for a #2 guy out of the current GOP crop, it would most likely be him. And I also now understand why Trump bowed out of the debate circuit, beyond the whole thing probably just being a media blitz, because Cain is every bit as to the point.
 
herman_cain_prez-0221.jpg
 
One Brow said:
So, abortions being more prevalent among the poor is supposed to work against them?
Click to expand...

Millsapa said:
I thought race was the key quality that worked against it, but how could you think it was fine to kill off children because their parents were poor? Some of the most brilliant people this world has to offer were born into poverty.
Click to expand...

One Brow said:
Every abortion is a tragedy, regardless of whether the child would have been brilliant or not. How shameful that you would use an attribute like brilliance as if it would affect teh worth of the person inside. I wonder if you have a little eugenicist inclinaiton inside you? That would explain your eagerness to connect them with the most evil government of the past 100 years.
Click to expand...

This exchange was interesting.
Apparently you thought pushing abortion among the poor was a good thing. Then when I question this remark all the sudden you change into self righteous mode where every abortion is a tragedy.
Then you "wonder" if I have a eugenicist in me because I was "eager" to connect them to an evil government.

Liberal logic amuses me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top