What's new
By:

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

Bucknutz said:
Another no response, just “Trump”, nothing about the original clip I posted stating this is a great explanation of Tariff’s.

He says the same thing you said:
“There's a difference between a surgical use of them which helps in some cases. Trump wants to use a sledgehammer.”

Not in the exact phrase but the same concept.

Yet you just post a laughing meme. I would recommend next time to actually take time to watch a clip that has been presented before you post. Then it would help you not look like a fool when you post a response.
Click to expand...
I gave you a response with how Trump is going to use it. Might I suggest reading comprehension classes if you don't get that?
 
TheStormofWar said:
I gave you a response with how Trump is going to use it. Might I suggest reading comprehension classes if you don't get that?
Click to expand...
Then look at my original post and see what I had to say about tariffs. See if you can take off your Trump blinders and you use your reading comprehension to see I wasn’t talking about Trump, I was talking about the use of Tariffs. I even said both administrations could use them this way and help Americans out.

So again, you just responded to argue, because of “Trump”, when in reality you (your own words), me and the Trump surrogate have the same philosophy on how to use tariffs.

It would have been a lot easier to watch the clip, read my post and try to not hate me because some times I like Trumps policies and bash on Kamala; then respond yeah I agree with this too.
 
Bucknutz said:
Then look at my original post and see what I had to say about tariffs. See if you can take off your Trump blinders and you use your reading comprehension to see I wasn’t talking about Trump, I was talking about the use of Tariffs. I even said both administrations could use them this way and help Americans out.

So again, you just responded to argue, because of “Trump”, when in reality you (your own words), me and the Trump surrogate have the same philosophy on how to use tariffs.

It would have been a lot easier to watch the clip, read my post and try to not hate me because some times I like Trumps policies and bash on Kamala; then respond yeah I agree with this too.
Click to expand...
It's not Trump blinders. It's a simple statement of fact. A flat a-bomb of a tariff helps no one except if they are looking for increased prices and unemployment.


Trade analysts are warning that new tariffs threatened by former President Donald Trump, which he doubled down on during Tuesday night’s presidential debate, will create inflationary pressures in the supply chain and ripple through the broader economy.

Trump defended his trade policy during the debate, dismissing concerns that blanket tariffs of up to 20% on all imports and additional tariffs of 60% to 100% on goods from China will lead to higher consumer prices.


Judah Levine, head of research for Freightos, says if history is any guide, additional tariffs will fuel ocean freight rates. During the first Trump administration, as importers rushed to move goods into the country before tariffs went into effect, ocean container rates from Asia to the U.S. West Coast started rising sharply in July 2018, and doubled by mid-November, according to Freightos data.
Click to expand...
Frankly, if you think that such a blanket tariff helps anyone, you are drunk. You should know better than that. Trump should be campaigning on ending inflationary pressures once and for all, not looking to increase them.

So again, if you don't get any of that, then that's on you.

So again, on Trump's proposal:
200w.gif
 
TheStormofWar said:
It's not Trump blinders. It's a simple statement of fact. A flat a-bomb of a tariff helps no one except if they are looking for increased prices and unemployment.



Frankly, if you think that such a blanket tariff helps anyone, you are drunk. You should know better than that. Trump should be campaigning on ending inflationary pressures once and for all, not looking to increase them.

So again, if you don't get any of that, then that's on you.

So again, on Trump's proposal:
200w.gif
Click to expand...
Last post on this from me. The clip has nothing to do with a blanket 20% tariff. I want nothing to do with a blanket 20% tariff, you don’t want a blanket 20% tariff.

You still have not watched the clip.

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!

I never said anything about Trump other than this clip had a Trump surrogate in it.

Not talking about Trump at all. No Trump.

I’m talking about the strategic use of tariffs that either administration can use to help the American people and businesses.

No Trump…still not talking about Trump, again no Trump in any of this. Never had it, not even now. Not about Trump.
 
Bucknutz said:
This:

View: https://x.com/jeremykauffman/status/1835782658091102608?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ


For saying most likely this:

View: https://x.com/jeremykauffman/status/1835649337574957477?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ

Because she is this:

View: https://x.com/endtribalism/status/1833560861845426259?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ


I will never vote for a far left extremist, which she is. 2 big ones: Wants to regulate speech, wants gun buybacks.

View: https://x.com/endtribalism/status/1831717581868171648?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ




View: https://x.com/catholicvote/status/1829707200979484955?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ


You guys are anti Trump, I get that. I really do. I just can’t with good faith vote for either of these options. Doesn’t mean I can’t agree with both of them on certain policies. I will side more with Trump on economy and immigration and I will side more with Kamala on social programs.

Again my vote doesn’t really matter in Florida anyway.
Click to expand...
Why does wanting to regulate free speech or gun buy backs make her a far left extremist?



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Bucknutz said:
Even Hillary is getting on the fun to jail Americans for “misinformation”.

When I say extremists, this is a prime example, just happened an hour ago.


View: https://x.com/nataliegwinters/status/1835858099598397594?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ

I mean if we regulate speech, maybe everyone of these people should be in jail:

View: https://x.com/collinrugg/status/1835765305316184142?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ
Click to expand...
Oh don't worry. Trump just wants to jail those who simply criticize him (even if the criticism is accurate true information) and according to Bill Barr, trumps AG, trump also just wants to execute people who upset him.


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Red said:
If the Democrat’s response to Biden’s debate performance was “OK, we’re gonna lose in all likelihood, but how bad could a second Trump presidency be”? I’d be both surprised and disappointed. Pissed as well I’m sure. Engaged in a present moment that includes the possibility of an angry authoritarian bent on retribution returning to the Oval Office, I’ll be damned if our response should be to accept that outcome as inevitable. There are two fundamental political realities at the moment.
Click to expand...
Change the rules to strip half the country of its voice. Climb atop a steel building or sit outside a fence to assassinate their candidate. You make it sound not only justified but noble.

Red said:
Sometimes you have to do things a little different to prevent a disastrous outcome. ... We’re in a situation that calls for acting in the best interest of our nation.
Click to expand...
There aren’t two fundamental political realities. There are two works of mostly fiction. Both are like the movie Forrest Gump. There are portrayals of real events used as scaffolding for the story but it is a work of fiction. It is deeply concerning to see how many have seemingly lost the ability to tell the difference between what is real and what is being contrived.
  • There is no authoritarian on the ballot
  • American Fascism isn’t coming
  • Christian Nationalism is not a force in 2024
  • Trump did not try to overthrow the government or prevent a peaceful transfer of power
  • The election isn’t that important
 
fishonjazz said:
Why does wanting to regulate free speech or gun buy backs make her a far left extremist?



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Okay 2 things.

1. The question was asked to me "Why am I anti-Kamala?"
My response was 1. Speech Regulation and 2. Mandatory Gun buybacks
This is because both of these ideas are chipping away from our rights and are terrible ideas, I mean terrible ideas. Speech regulation is the worst idea anyone can propose. Even posters on this forum are trying to get behind it, almost exclusively people on the left. Its a short sighted view on the topic and MT Steve is doing a great job explaining why.

2. I called Kamala a far left extremist, not because of those 2 things but because of:

1. Open Border policies
2. Pack the Supreme Court because you don't like what they have decided. You blame Trump for this, but it is a Democrat who did not step down when age and health was a concern and gave Trump a 3rd pick
3. Remove the Filibuster

And more. I have videos and articles with her and her views on these topics, but I have realized that YOU and many other posters do not watch or read the provided media to support my views or show the point Im trying to make. It has bacame very obvious that most posters here really just want to argue, play gotcha or just not really want to look at something that is opposite of their view. I have also noticed many posters can't even process the argument the other person is making. No critical thinking, no effort, no real responses; just make fun of the other, call them a troll, or shame them.
 
fishonjazz said:
Oh don't worry. Trump just wants to jail those who simply criticize him (even if the criticism is accurate true information) and according to Bill Barr, trumps AG, trump also just wants to execute people who upset him.


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Show me a video with him in public, not 3rd party hearsay, that displays him stating he wants to regulate speech, throw democrats in a reeducation camp, jail people for misinformation or even jail someone who "simply criticizes him". The first thing I will do is I will say I am anti-Trump for his view on this topic. Again, still not voting for him either way.

You never addressed my post. Just changed it to Trump. If you're ok with what Kamala, Tim, Hillary, posters on this Forum and other people on the left to regulate speech, then you should be happy Trump would want to jail people who criticize him. Those are the same ideas coming from Kamala, Tim and Hillary.

I am the opposite of this. I think its a truly short sighted view on the 1st amendment. People not seeing or realizing what would come if that happens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top