What's new
By:

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

fishonjazz said:
Again giving trump the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
It’s not giving him the benefit of the doubt. If you look what’s going on in the field and nation, it’s not looking good for Kamala.
fishonjazz said:
I think Kamala will win. I still believe in America. I think it will be close though and wouldn't be shocked if trump won. He has won already in your mind for some strange reason
Click to expand...
Again, look outside of your normal information sources. Just see what people are saying in the Harris campaign, what democrats are saying, what internals polls are leaking. What candidates are changing strategies and where they are spending money. Look at trends in polls. All these things can show the pulse of the election. It’s not based off of a strange reason.
 
fishonjazz said:
Again giving trump the benefit of the doubt.

I think Kamala will win. I still believe in America. I think it will be close though and wouldn't be shocked if trump won. He has won already in your mind for some strange reason

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
If there was voter apathy, which I was concerned about, I think Trump would have won. The fact that voters seem to be extraordinarily energetic and engaged, I don't think Trump has a chance. I mean I think he does have a chance, just not in as realistic a way that I did before.
 
Bucknutz said:
Don’t worry, I won’t post another Anti-Kamala post. I’ve already said why she is an extremist, why I won’t vote for her. In 20 some days, this forum will go back to the normal 24/7 coverage of Trump hate for the next 4 years.
Click to expand...
By all means, continue to be critical of Kamala. Maybe just throw an unprompted trump criticism in once in a while.
Or don't. I don't care. But don't act surprised at how you are perceived even you are only critical of one candidate. (Except when prompted)

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Bucknutz said:
It’s not giving him the benefit of the doubt. If you look what’s going on in the field and nation, it’s not looking good for Kamala.

Again, look outside of your normal information sources. Just see what people are saying in the Harris campaign, what democrats are saying, what internals polls are leaking. What candidates are changing strategies and where they are spending money. Look at trends in polls. All these things can show the pulse of the election. It’s not based off of a strange reason.
Click to expand...
I look at lots of sources. They all say it's a virtual tie. And every time I look at the polls they say how many people were surveyed. It's rarely more than 1,000 people. I have never been polled.
Polls should be taken with a grain of salt and even if you believe them they are saying the election is within the margin of error.

But go ahead. Give the election to trump lol.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
fishonjazz said:
With trump you get both. Do your research. Google "trump talking about regulating speech"
Difference is the reasons why they react to regulate it. Kamala it's because of misinformation and toxicity to Americans.
Click to expand...
Yeah a big hard no for me.
fishonjazz said:
trump wants to regulate those who are critical of Him.
Click to expand...
Where do you see this? I googled and it was saying people should be thrown in Jail for a year for burning a US flag?
fishonjazz said:
We have discussed on here already. Just more evidence that there is always more new things to learn about how bad trump sucks.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Please present the news article with facts, a video of him saying it. I don’t want to see an opinion piece or some out of context story.

I have already shown videos of Tim and Kamala, themselves talking about regulating speech. I need to see it from Trump.
 
fishonjazz said:
I look at lots of sources. They all say it's a virtual tie. And every time I look at the polls they say how many people were surveyed. It's rarely more than 1,000 people. I have never been polled.
Polls should be taken with a grain of salt and even if you believe them they are saying the election is within the margin of error.

But go ahead. Give the election to trump lol.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

This is from today, from all recent state polls. I don’t know how more evidence you need to see where it’s trending. Virginia an MN polls are starting to get really close.

This is from Real Clear Politics, based off of state polls. Recent polls have Trump winning every swing state.
GaHuYmJXkAAms_-.jpeg
 
fishonjazz said:
With trump you get both. Do your research. Google "trump talking about regulating speech"
Difference is the reasons why they react to regulate it. Kamala it's because of misinformation and toxicity to Americans.
trump wants to regulate those who are critical of Him.
We have discussed on here already. Just more evidence that there is always more new things to learn about how bad trump sucks.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I was going to comment on this one as well. Trump is the one who said he will jail his political opponents. How exactly is that a bastion of free speech?

And who are his political opponents? Apparently everyone who opposes him, and he will need to use the military to deal with them?

www.nytimes.com

Trump Escalates Threats to Political Opponents He Deems the ‘Enemy’

Never before has a presidential nominee openly suggested turning the military on Americans simply because they oppose his candidacy. With voting underway, Donald Trump has turned to dark vows of retribution.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com


Talk to us more about free speech being the Hallmark of the right...
 
Bawse Dawg said:

Sorry Reddit links don’t work very well but here he is saying that the national guard or military should round up the radical leftists. Also known as “people who don’t support Donald Trump”.
Click to expand...
Projection much? How about "also known as people who climb on buildings and hide along golf courses to get a chance to kill a politician they don't agree with"? Are those radical lefties okay to remove from society?
 
LogGrad98 said:
I was going to comment on this one as well. Trump is the one who said he will jail his political opponents. How exactly is that a bastion of free speech?

And who are his political opponents? Apparently everyone who opposes him, and he will need to use the military to deal with them?

www.nytimes.com

Trump Escalates Threats to Political Opponents He Deems the ‘Enemy’

Never before has a presidential nominee openly suggested turning the military on Americans simply because they oppose his candidacy. With voting underway, Donald Trump has turned to dark vows of retribution.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com


Talk to us more about free speech being the Hallmark of the right...
Click to expand...

his political opponents are anyone he perceives hasn't given him 100 % total loyalty. Unless of course they change their mind and then give him their fealty again and then it's all good. And the weird thing is he doesn't even care, i heard an interview with him once where he even acknowledged that if he didn't talk to people who he'd had conflict with in the past he wouldn't be talking to anyone. I think narcissists or whatever he is just thrive on the drama and conflict so much that they aren't fussed at all by the perception that people have said negative things about them in the past and clearly probably still do think those things As long as they tell him currently how good he is.

to be fair though that military thing has been taken out of context. He was basically asked what if there's riots and violence on the streets the day after if he wins, and he said if necessary he'd deploy the national guard and military if need be. The stupid thing is he won't even be in power then to do anything. He's such a douche, all he had to say is the authorities will handle it.

**** me when is this ******** gonna end ??
 
Douchebag K said:
his political opponents are anyone he perceives hasn't given him 100 % total loyalty. Unless of course they change their mind and then give him their fealty again and then it's all good. And the weird thing is he doesn't even care, i heard an interview with him once where he even acknowledged that if he didn't talk to people who he'd had conflict with in the past he wouldn't be talking to anyone. I think narcissists or whatever he is just thrive on the drama and conflict so much that they aren't fussed at all by the perception that people have said negative things about them in the past and clearly probably still do think those things As long as they tell him currently how good he is.

to be fair though that military thing has been taken out of context. He was basically asked what if there's riots and violence on the streets the day after if he wins, and he said if necessary he'd deploy the national guard and military if need be. The stupid thing is he won't even be in power then to do anything. He's such a douche, all he had to say is the authorities will handle it.

**** me when is this ******** gonna end ??
Click to expand...
Well he already actually literally used the national guard against protestors (note , not rioters) to get a photo op at a church. Once he has power again, with the full backing of immunity from the supreme Court, anything is on the table and anything he thinks of is possible. The idea is frankly terrifying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top