Safetydan
Well-Known Member
But thats the thing. They dont have to improve anyones lives after they win. They run on those things you suggested, get the votes, get into office and say that they tried to fight against the swamp and implement all the wonderful things but the other side blocked everything (this would probably be true anyways so they wouldn't even be lying to us) that they tried to pass.
Candidates ALWAYS say they are gonna do lots of **** to get votes and then never do it.
If somebody were to campaign on something like M4A and win in a landslide, the cat is out of the bag at that point. They'd have no excuses if they had a majority in both houses of Congress. They'd lose their messaging leverage and longevity for not delivering.
This is conjecture on my part. I do want to see it attempted but I think this is why they wouldn't do that. They need that carrot out in front of the horse as long as they can keep it there.
Letting Bernie through their primary gives the game away so to speak so of course they did what they could to ensure he'd lose.