What's new

The Corruption of the Supreme Court

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Troll response. You complain about trolls yet you post like them.

"@Bucknutz You understand that you’re not entitled to my attention, right? I find you boorish and largely a waste of time."
Interesting... if you find me boorish and a waste of time, why ask for my opinion? Also I'm not entitled to anyones attention. Since this is a public message board, if you post something that is just lacking context or making **** up, I will respond. You can take my response how ever you want. Since you called me out to give you a response, here it is.


Thomas has nothing to do with what happened at Stanford. You're trying to combine two different issues into one, which is not working.


Absolutely, if he did what has been reported.

Let me even go deeper so I'm very clear here. I don't care that he was vacationing with some Right sided Billionaire. I personally don't believe these benefits changed anything in court opinions because Thomas is as far right that you can be. Just like I wouldn't believe RBG would have changed any of her opinions, if she was in this same situation with a leftist Billionaire.

When you are in this type of position, your personal and professional standard needs to be higher than an average citizen or congress person. It's standard be higher than the position of the President as well. Even though he might have had a genuine relationship with this person, you put the position above this type of relationship.

Transparency is key. Don't keep these things hidden from the public. This is not ethical or (does not look lawful either). This is why he should resign. You have one of the most American Government cherished jobs, which this country relies on you. You do everything to keep this high standard, which Thomas did not do.


A judge. It was more about youth and how colleges let their students treat people with a different view point. I was showing how people shout down the opposition, just like in this forum.


Silent on how he treated you and me? How did he treat you or me? You despise the court already because it is not tilted in your favor. All this did was give you a talking point. This judge didn't treat you any different.


Show us the proof of these bribes... this is just misinformation or more like flat out lies. Taking vacations with a friend is not a bribe.


Yes it's concerning that he could have broken laws and ethical rules. Just like I stated above. Yet, freedom of speech is probably my biggest concern. I have been posting about this topic in many different threads. So no, this situation is not as concerning to me as freedom of speech.


I am. That's the difference between us, this is not hard for me to do.
Oh. Okay. Well, seeing how you’ve done this to me several times I thought it was fair game. But if you don’t like being tagged in posts then I’ll respect your wishes as long as I’m treated the same way. Thanks for your response. I’m glad we can both agree that Thomas should resign.
 
Oh. Okay. Well, seeing how you’ve done this to me several times I thought it was fair game. But if you don’t like being tagged in posts then I’ll respect your wishes as long as I’m treated the same way. Thanks for your response. I’m glad we can both agree that Thomas should resign.
Bucknutz has been the golden standard of conservative commentators on jazzfanz.com. He should held up as an example of someone who advocates for the unpopular opinion but does so in a respectable and honorable way.

It's not a good look to talk down to him like you keep doing.
 
Bucknutz has been the golden standard of conservative commentators on jazzfanz.com. He should held up as an example of someone who advocates for the unpopular opinion but does so in a respectable and honorable way.

It's not a good look to talk down to him like you keep doing.
The last post was sincere. I didn’t think I was talking down to him. I’m fine admitting when I’m wrong. But I didn’t mean for the last post to be demeaning. I hope respect can be mutual. I’ve been tagged several times by him in some pretty hostile and personal posts in the past. So again, respect can be given, as long as it’s mutual.
 
The last post was sincere. I didn’t think I was talking down to him. I’m fine admitting when I’m wrong. But I didn’t mean for the last post to be demeaning. I hope respect can be mutual. I’ve been tagged several times by him in some pretty hostile and personal posts in the past. So again, respect can be given, as long as it’s mutual.
I took your last post as sincere. I think he was talking about the previous post. I don’t mind being tagged. I was just bringing up your last comment towards me. We have had heated personal posts with each other in the past and it’s going to continue because I know you’re not going to change your views and I’m not trying to change them. So there will be a natural clash of views.
 
Bucknutz has been the golden standard of conservative commentators on jazzfanz.com. He should held up as an example of someone who advocates for the unpopular opinion but does so in a respectable and honorable way.

It's not a good look to talk down to him like you keep doing.
Thanks I appreciate that your kind words.
 
It’s interesting to me how posters here have focused endlessly on Hunter Biden supposed corruption while ignorant the blatant corruption of a Supreme Court justice they just so happen to agree with. If this were Biden? He’d be impeached. If this had been RBG? The meltdown on the right would’ve melted the earth’s crust.
 
It’s interesting to me how posters here have focused endlessly on Hunter Biden supposed corruption while ignorant the blatant corruption of a Supreme Court justice they just so happen to agree with. If this were Biden? He’d be impeached. If this had been RBG? The meltdown on the right would’ve melted the earth’s crust.
One of Thomas's good friends is posting about (smaller) corruption by RBG and Sotomayer. It's time to take SCOTUS off the honor system.
 
Back
Top