The Jazz target in the offseason.

[Park Bites]

That is pretty funny... I'm sure Burke will be gone. I don't think they'd ax Tibor just yet, but he may be trade fodder at some point. CJ is a good dude but 100% replaceable... and we likely should seek an upgrade there. Withey could also be moved...

Point is that we can easily find a roster spot for Durant when he's ready to sign.

I agree burke is gone. Cj can be gone. Pleiss could be traded. Withey could be gone. Booker, regretfully, will be gone. That is 5 roster spots the jazz will ne looking to upgrade.

I dont think ingles will be gone he is the perfect 10th through 12th man on your bench. Good team guy.

Jazz will have their first rounder to fill and hopefully one of the seconds. That still leaves 3 open. I would figure at least 1 player will come back in a trade if not 2. So in all honesty the jazz will have 1 solid free agent signing.

I would not complain up about a mid to upper teir free agent. That is why i said batum because he might just come for 12 mill a year to start. Start hayward and batum then bring hood in off the bench.

 

[K-Man #32]

Rarely have I seen teams reach deep in their pockets in free agency and have very much success.

That's a true statement my friend, I agree totally.

For everyone who is on the Gay support group, I saw Gay in Toronto, we don't want him. He has deteriorated, very lazy on D but can score still. Gay would want too much money and can't produce enough for my liking.

 

[b_line]

I'm not telling you my plan.

If anybody else would like to know, PM me or go over to the TPP forum where I've laid it all out. tia

Is the tpp forum as annoying as tpp is on the reg forum? Or does he drop the persona over there?

 

[b_line]

What do you guys think our record would be if we had Mack all season? I bet we would be 5th seed this year. at least 45 wins, probably closer to 50 maybe.

 

[NAOS]

Is the tpp forum as annoying as tpp is on the reg forum? Or does he drop the persona over there?

that's his real personality, braugh. He's from one of the 'stans, I think.

 

[NAOS]

What do you guys think our record would be if we had Mack all season? I bet we would be 5th seed this year. at least 45 wins, probably closer to 50 maybe.

5th seed, easily. We're narrowly going to miss that as it is.

 

[b_line]

5th seed, easily. We're narrowly going to miss that as it is.

It sucks, because I think a series between Jazz and Clippers could be very interesting. We still probably lose that series this year, but it would be a great experience, and a lot of fun to watch.

 

[NAOS]

It sucks, because I think a series between Jazz and Clippers could be very interesting. We still probably lose that series this year, but it would be a great experience, and a lot of fun to watch.

yep. A tiny bit less hyperconservativism would most likely have paid off.

Had to bakk the cakk, doe.

 

[b_line]

yep. A tiny bit less hyperconservativism would most likely have paid off.

Had to bakk the cakk, doe.

I was getting a little bit upset around the trade deadline and right after, but I am pretty happy with the way this team is shaping up otherwise. I think we would have been at least as good with Exum in place of Mack, though, so I was happy before the injury.

I would like to see a big third wing though.

 

[Jeffrey32]

If we are dreaming....Trey for Rustle Westbrook.

I think OKC would be happy to trade for Rustle Westbrook, probably not Russell Westbrook though.

 

[b_line]

I think OKC would be happy to trade for Rustle Westbrook, probably not Russell Westbrook though.

They want that guy out of Oklahoma, he has been rustling too much cattle.

 

[NAOS]

I was getting a little bit upset around the trade deadline and right after, but I am pretty happy with the way this team is shaping up otherwise. I think we would have been at least as good with Exum in place of Mack, though, so I was happy before the injury.

I would like to see a big third wing though.

We might have had to pay a little bit more for Mack last offseason (after Dante's injury) or in the earlier part of this year, but I'd be shocked if the deal couldn't have gotten done for 2 second-rounders whenever we wanted. We obviously knew exactly what he was the whole time. We've played it all hyperconservatively. Hyper. I'm less easily soothed. Neto is going to be a decent player, but we over-invested in him (specifically in terms of minutes played). Favors's back, Burks's stuff, etc. The list is long.