https://www.draftexpress.com/article/Just-By-the-Numbers-the-2011-Guard-Crop-3749
https://www.draftexpress.com/article/Situational-Statistics-the-2011-Guard-Crop-3759
These articles don't have a ton to say about Knight, and it's very mixed when it does (and that's being nice). If you look at all of the tables, Knight doesn't stand out at all in any category. Now, I know there's more to the game than numbers, but this is giving me a lot of pause about drafting Knight so high.
Adding to the puzzle that the Jazz have nothing to gain whatsoever by leaking that Knight is their guy (or at least NOT leaking that Kanter is), and I'm confused. And a little concerned.
https://www.draftexpress.com/article/Situational-Statistics-the-2011-Guard-Crop-3759
-Brandon Knight's .901 points per possession overall ranks 15th, but he's hurt by a low amount of transition possessions and poor efficiency on those possessions. Knight's 0.896 PPP in the halfcourt ranks a slightly better 13th.
Knight hurts himself in the halfcourt by having one of the higher turnover percentages (16.9%) and one of the lower free-throw drawing percentages (10.0%), which negates his above average adjusted field goal percentage of 50.9%.
Breaking down his possession distribution, Knight had an above average number of spot-ups (20.5% of the time), an average number of isolations (17.1% of the time), and the third lowest percentage of pick-and-rolls (14.3% of the time). Knight actually performed the best relative to his peers in isolations, boasting a sixth-best 0.975 PPP.
Knight didn't attack the basket at a high rate, taking shots around the basket on just 20% of his halfcourt possessions, third lowest of the group. His 1.294 PPS on these attempts bodes well for him, though, and he could find more attempts to do this in the more open NBA.
Knight comes out in the middle of the pack in jump shot distribution and efficiency, not standing out in any area, with his lack of efficiency being somewhat surprising given the high number of three-pointers he attempts.
These articles don't have a ton to say about Knight, and it's very mixed when it does (and that's being nice). If you look at all of the tables, Knight doesn't stand out at all in any category. Now, I know there's more to the game than numbers, but this is giving me a lot of pause about drafting Knight so high.
Adding to the puzzle that the Jazz have nothing to gain whatsoever by leaking that Knight is their guy (or at least NOT leaking that Kanter is), and I'm confused. And a little concerned.