What's new

The Trade Favors and Add a Replacement In Free Agency Thread

Damnit HH, I even said Tia. Favors is officially the most underrated player in Utah now. Utah is on the verge of something special, and Favors is a big part of that. There are many reasons why Favors isn't getting traded, and I'm on my phone right now, so I can't write the book of a post I'd like to, so I'll make it short for now. It's a terrible idea and it ain't happening.

I know, but I'm bored. Also a hair drunkered.

Imagine if the Pellies took that though. Awesome

Pellies are going to lose AD. The team they surrounded him with is sad.

Please note: I dropped the HH thing cause there were too many other HH's. Tryin to move past HH man. I'm in the note(♪) crowd now. A crowd of one. yeah buddy
 
Favors' age, defense, character, contract, & improving mid-range jump shot make him the 2nd most valuable player on this team. The only way he should be traded is in a blockbuster that brings in a superstar, which is unlikely (although should be considered if the right deal ever came along).

I know this is blasphemy on Jazzfanz, but the player this thread should be about is Hayward. He is one of the best 2-way players in the NBA, represents everything that this franchise stands for (with his hustle, work ethic, character, etc), & is the reason that our offense wasn't near the bottom of the league statistically last season, but he can opt-out in 2 years (when Exum projects to become a significant contributor- meaning when we project to legitimately compete) & will likely require a max contract extension under the new salary cap (which very few players will be worth even if the cap does rise to 100 mil), if he's even interested in re-signing (which I expect him to be unless we're still a lottery team, although you never know).

Unless there is any indication that he would consider signing for less than the max, which is possible, but would likely depend on us being legitimate championship contenders by then (which may prove difficult with Exum starting), I think it needs to be considered. As much as I love Hayward & what he brings to this team, I'm not sure he will be worth 20+ mil, & to lose him for nothing just as we begin to become truly competitive would set back the franchise more than Al/Sap walking did (or trading him now would). We could wait a year but his value would be significantly lower due to his opt-out clause.

Not saying we should necessarily trade Hayward, just that if we're going to have a thread about dealing one of our big three, it should be about him instead of Favors.
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of caveats to saying yes, but this idea that Favors is untradable because he has a nice contract (for now) and "likes it here" is about the biggest loser **** I have ever read on this site.
 
There are a lot of caveats to saying yes, but this idea that Favors is untradable because he has a nice contract (for now) and "likes it here" is about the biggest loser **** I have ever read on this site.

The likelihood of trading him is pretty low though. We would have to get one hell of an offer.
 
I know, but I'm bored. Also a hair drunkered.

Imagine if the Pellies took that though. Awesome

Pellies are going to lose AD. The team they surrounded him with is sad.

Please note: I dropped the HH thing cause there were too many other HH's. Tryin to move past HH man. I'm in the note(♪) crowd now. A crowd of one. yeah buddy

I Was referring to the HH that started this thread. Perhaps you are more than a little drunkered? Also, are you saying you are the poster formally known as heaven Harris?
 
There are a lot of caveats to saying yes, but this idea that Favors is untradable because he has a nice contract (for now) and "likes it here" is about the biggest loser **** I have ever read on this site.

Trading Favors would be ****ing stupid, and the fact he signed a team friendly contract and likes Utah are just a few of the legitimate reasons why. If you don't like those answers, it's ok because the best reason is not monkeying with success once you find it. Gobert/Favors make up the best defensive front court in the NBA, and that foundation should be built on, not torn apart as if it isn't something special. Anyone seriously discussing this is criminally underating Favors. It's not just a terrible idea because Favors likes Utah.
 
Favors' age, defense, character, contract, & improving mid-range jump shot make him the 2nd most valuable player on this team. The only way he should be traded is in a blockbuster that brings in a superstar, which is unlikely (although should be considered if the right deal ever came along).

I know this is blasphemy on Jazzfanz, but the player this thread should be about is Hayward. He is one of the best 2-way players in the NBA, represents everything that this franchise stands for (with his hustle, work ethic, character, etc), & is the reason that our offense wasn't near the bottom of the league statistically last season, but he can opt-out in 2 years (when Exum projects to become a significant contributor- meaning when we project to legitimately compete) & will likely require a max contract extension under the new salary cap (which very few players will be worth even if the cap does rise to 100 mil), if he's even interested in re-signing (which I expect him to be unless we're still a lottery team, although you never know).

Unless there is any indication that he would consider signing for less than the max, which is possible, but would likely depend on us being legitimate championship contenders by then (which may prove difficult with Exum starting), I think it needs to be considered. As much as I love Hayward & what he brings to this team, I'm not sure he will be worth 20+ mil, & to lose him for nothing just as we begin to become truly competitive would set back the franchise more than Al/Sap walking did (or trading him now would). We could wait a year but his value would be significantly lower due to his opt-out clause.

Not saying we should necessarily trade Hayward, just that if we're going to have a thread about dealing one of our big three, it should be about him instead of Favors.

Utah should not be trading anyone named Rudy, Gordon, Derrick or Dante right now. Depending on how the season goes however, I agree that Hayward will be our first concern.
 
Assume we trade and get the 4th pick and a 2017 nyc first for Favors.

Trade: 4th, 12th, our 2017 first, Knicks 2017 first, OKC 2017 first, GSW 2017 first and Exum for Anthony Davis.


Hayward, Davis, Gobert, OMG
Where do people come up with this ****?
 
Back
Top