7StraightIsGreat
Well-Known Member
To address a few points on Freakazoid's statistical comparison of Boozer-Jefferson:
Forgive, but I am again going to reference some David Locke numbers because the guy does a crazy amount of research. He watched Al Jefferson's last 200 post up's from last season. He talked about how amazing it is to see that once getting the ball, Jefferson got no help from his teammates. Not one time was there a cross screen, a cutter going to the basket, nothing. Each and every time Jefferson got the ball, his teammates cleared the area and let Jefferson do all the work. Now, and this is the biggest thing that worries me about Jefferson, he has to learn to pass the ball out of the post when he's getting double and triple teamed. While it is a worry, I think it won't become a problem because for the first time in his career Al is going to learn he has help and where that help will be coming from each and every position. No need to force a post up shot when he's got 2 or 3 guys on him. That's what he was doing in Minny, and that's obviously going to lead to a lower FG %.
Boozer is obvioulsy a much better jump shooter, but I guees you have to ask yourself what you'd rather have in the Jazz offense: A PF with a really good outside jumper but is only taking into the low post 25% of the time, or a PF with a simply decent jumper from 15 feet in who lives on the low block and likes mixing it up physically. I know which one I'm choosing.
This would be my guess for the upcoming season: Al Jefferson is going to have the most offensively efficient year of his career. I'm not saying you'll immediately see numbers that compare with Boozer's numbers while in Utah, but I think you'll see a steady improvement over the next couple of years in that area. On the flip side, I think you'll see Boozer's percentages drop off a little bit in Chicago. His numbers won't fall of the face of the earth, but I do think you'll see a decline. Now that the Bulls have signed Brewer and he will reportedly be starting, that's not a great jump shooting starting 5. I'm interested to see how Boozer carries the load there.
Forgive, but I am again going to reference some David Locke numbers because the guy does a crazy amount of research. He watched Al Jefferson's last 200 post up's from last season. He talked about how amazing it is to see that once getting the ball, Jefferson got no help from his teammates. Not one time was there a cross screen, a cutter going to the basket, nothing. Each and every time Jefferson got the ball, his teammates cleared the area and let Jefferson do all the work. Now, and this is the biggest thing that worries me about Jefferson, he has to learn to pass the ball out of the post when he's getting double and triple teamed. While it is a worry, I think it won't become a problem because for the first time in his career Al is going to learn he has help and where that help will be coming from each and every position. No need to force a post up shot when he's got 2 or 3 guys on him. That's what he was doing in Minny, and that's obviously going to lead to a lower FG %.
Boozer is obvioulsy a much better jump shooter, but I guees you have to ask yourself what you'd rather have in the Jazz offense: A PF with a really good outside jumper but is only taking into the low post 25% of the time, or a PF with a simply decent jumper from 15 feet in who lives on the low block and likes mixing it up physically. I know which one I'm choosing.
This would be my guess for the upcoming season: Al Jefferson is going to have the most offensively efficient year of his career. I'm not saying you'll immediately see numbers that compare with Boozer's numbers while in Utah, but I think you'll see a steady improvement over the next couple of years in that area. On the flip side, I think you'll see Boozer's percentages drop off a little bit in Chicago. His numbers won't fall of the face of the earth, but I do think you'll see a decline. Now that the Bulls have signed Brewer and he will reportedly be starting, that's not a great jump shooting starting 5. I'm interested to see how Boozer carries the load there.