carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
I'm not a lawyer, but I thought judges are generally given more rope to rule on the length of the sentence if:
1. The accused is a 1st time offender;
2. The accused is an outstanding citizen of the community (appropriate references should be brought in as proof);
3. The accused is truly remorseful of his/her action.
It seems to me that up until that point of sentencing, the lawyer had done a good job in convincing the judge that the above 3 conditions are met.
...."first time offense?" I don't think so! "outstanding citizen?" Wrong again! "truly remorseful?" Do we want to go for double jeopardy where the money really doubles? Not an expert on domestic violence but from what they tell me, if you draw a female judge, you've got two chances, slim and none! In Chad's case, he shouldn't have even cleared his throat when addressing the court and that judge! A polite "yes mam!" would have been the best response.