NAOS
Well-Known Member
Yeah, that’s a good dataset you got there. Very convinced.0-4 first game. Got burned three times on D that I remember. Sucked in the bubble.
I'll be here all year.
Yeah, that’s a good dataset you got there. Very convinced.0-4 first game. Got burned three times on D that I remember. Sucked in the bubble.
I'll be here all year.
You like what saw from Royce in the playoffs and last night?Yeah, that’s a good dataset you got there. Very convinced.
In a word, Yes. Did he have a few moments that were below his averages? Yes. All players do.You like what saw from Royce in the playoffs and last night?
He's not a starter on a title team. So if you want average and early exits....He’s a solid 3&D player. 25+ teams have a spot in their starting lineup for someone with his skill set.
Jesus weptI thought Royce played well.
He is the Best Friend of Mitchell.
good defence.Royce gets no offensive sets, plays decent to good defense, and will hit open looks at an above average clip when given the chance.
He isn't paid much and it would be very easy to move his contract as an asset.
There is really no reason to dislike what he brings or his fit on the team.
His lows are low. But he’s fine. What does Covington get paid compared to Royce? I wasn’t exactly impressed with RoCo either last night.good defence.
Dawg actually focus on him. You'll see him get blown by, destroyed on screens etc.
Hes not a good defender