What's not debatable is that the Jazz got nothing. I'd rather "gamble" on proven asset than gamble that assets that typically amount to nothing. What cap moves are the Jazz missing out on by having to spend on their own player, anyway? They obviously can or won't do anything on the market, and if they have a really good player at a positional logjam, they can trade and keep the asset(s) moving. I have no idea why people are out-thinking themselves about this, especially in hindsight.Complete fabrication. Nowhere stated or implied.
Surely you understand that it is not only about talent but also about the price of that talent versus how you would otherwise use the cap room.
Surely you see that a max contract on Jackson is debatable and how it would constrain the Jazz future personnel moves.