So they each play 6 minutes? That’s not a thing.I’d love to see Clarkson’s minutes divided between Forrest, Butler and NAW.
So they each play 6 minutes? That’s not a thing.I’d love to see Clarkson’s minutes divided between Forrest, Butler and NAW.
So they each play 6 minutes? That’s not a thing.
Naw. We need perimeter defense, maybe you caught a whiff here and there about that.Lol, Ingles minutes too.
There can only be so many first or second round exits before something has to change. I think this off-season would be too early though. I would give this current group of players at least two more years to see what they could do. The core is signed together until the end of the 2023 season.
Hell, the package Sabonis commanded really opened up my eyes. Who’s knows what Rudy would get.
I really don’t know if I could do Donny and Frens for two .500 seasons before he asks out and after his market value has dipped.I agree changes should be made but trading Rudy ain't it. Every avenue should be explored to re-tool around Rudy and Donovan. If we trade Rudy, I'd just as soon trade Don too and just blow the whole ****ing thing up.
I agree changes should be made but trading Rudy ain't it. Every avenue should be explored to re-tool around Rudy and Donovan. If we trade Rudy, I'd just as soon trade Don too and just blow the whole ****ing thing up.
I mean if Boston had a Rudy Gobert, I think their last 5 years goes a lot differently. Rudy is a unique player. There isn't anyone else like him in the NBA.My biggest fear at this point is that after we go out in the first or second round again this year, Ainge will convince Smith that we should trade Gobert and Smith will listen. You look at the teams Ainge built in Boston and he never spent a lot of money on the center position.
Naw. We need perimeter defense, maybe you caught a whiff here and there about that.
Hopefully you’re right about NAW eventually, but this year I’m not putting him ahead of anyone on the depth chart to find out.
I mean if Boston had a Rudy Gobert, I think their last 5 years goes a lot differently. Rudy is a unique player. There isn't anyone else like him in the NBA.
If that’s how we’re looking at it then I’m alright with that. But I have my doubts it’ll be that clear-cut and either way it’s gonna look like garnish for at least a while on a salary dump.I have really loved what I’ve seen from Forrest. He should be getting more minutes if anything. I don’t think anyone thinks NAW is going to become our 6th man this year or something. He’s a good prospect to take a flier on in my opinion especially when the cost is so low.
If that’s how we’re looking at it then I’m alright with that. But I have my doubts it’ll be that clear-cut and either way it’s gonna look like garnish for at least a while on a salary dump.
I think I’m done talking about this for now.
Some of this I get. Why would we have given Forrest Oni's role last year? Oni was playing great defense in his limited minutes and hitting the three. Exactly what we needed, it didnt end up panning out but we were trying to get him to be that player. This year we have been trying Forrest all season in limited stints and he has played well since early. He is getting more of a chance now and improving. It is promising.The point about Shaq or anyone else not being good isn’t true point. The point is showing that we’re trying to address an issue. I even qualify that by saying we could fall flat doing so. Even last year I said that I’d be fine if we gave Forrest the Oni role. It’s great that he’s looked good during this stretch, but if we didn’t have COVID and injuries, none of this would have happened. We’d be doing the same **** come hell or high water. If a guy forgets it’s his mom’s birthday and ends up calling her to ask about something else but finds out it’s her birthday in the process, he doesn’t get points for being an awesome son even if he plays it off. I’m sorry.
And for what it’s worth on Udoh, he left because he didn’t get playing time. If you’re offering him the spot behind Gobert, the money would be irrelevant, also (especially when you consider how many millions and assets we sunk on that spot). Udoh was making $3.3M in China. The two years he was with us we paid him $3.2M and $3.4M. But Udoh wasn’t the point. The point is that many people here create a straw man, as if we’re pissed that we didn’t trade for Thybulle or Smart (hell I mostly advocated against Smart). I bring up Udoh as a reference that what I’m gauging this on is evidence of our effort to recognize a problem and address it, and not constant bitching that we didn’t land some savior piece.
We put forth a lot of effort to drop salary, though. Imagine if a smidge of that focus and effort could have actually been on improving the team.