Doublea
Well-Known Member
Just keeping Burke is better than Lawson.
I could see us getting some assets back. Viewing the trade as a salary dump, with the potential of getting a player who might turn his season around.
Just keeping Burke is better than Lawson.
Just keeping Burke is better than Lawson. At least he has accepted his role on the team.
Late first are virtually worthless. If your the Jazz why do you take somebody else's problems without getting compensated for the risk?Quick Question to those wanting HOU pick included:
If you're a GM, would you trade a late first for Trey Burke?
Quick Question to those wanting HOU pick included:
If you're a GM, would you trade a late first for Trey Burke?
Quick Question to those wanting HOU pick included:
If you're a GM, would you trade a late first for Trey Burke?
Yeah, I'm sure Lawson will be buried in max contract offers! Best case scenario, we keep him to back up Exum if he pans out.
Late first are virtually worthless. If your the Jazz why do you take somebody else's problems without getting compensated for the risk?
To backup Exum next season? You want to waste $13 million for a backup pg? Better to use those money to buy other players next season.
To backup Exum next season? You want to waste $13 million for a backup pg? Better to use those money to buy other players next season.
Yes, but HOU pick isn't a late-first.