There's really no reason to trade Lauri if he's willing to extend. We have demonstrated we can be bad enough with him. If the offer is overwhelming then I think you have to do it. It would have to be like the level of trade we got for Don/Rudy.
Can Lauri do that?Nah Lauri can play either forward position and Keegan is big too so that isn’t an issue at all.
I agree basically. Especially this year. I just don't want to be like the 7th or 8th best team for purposes of the 2025 draft and I could see some of the young guys leveling up to a point we are on the play in fringe. I also think 3 straight years of finishing 5th - 9th ish would lead to Lauri starting to look around. He'd still have tremendous value BUT we really gonna half *** a tank for Wemby AND Flagg?There's really no reason to trade Lauri if he's willing to extend. We have demonstrated we can be bad enough with him. If the offer is overwhelming then I think you have to do it. It would have to be like the level of trade we got for Don/Rudy.
On the Kings... yeah no problem. Fox/Sabonis obviously have the ball a lot. Keegan can do a little more. I mean if they are swapping Barnes or Keegan for Lauri they aren't giving up like PG for Lauri. It would just be a much better version of what they have now.Can Lauri do that?
I mean it's entirely context dependent of course, but it's tough to call Lauri a wing when he can't dribble or pass at an average starter wing level
Without knowing what every team could offer fully, it seems like the Thunder might have fallen off as the Godfather team when the Josh Giddey stuff happened.The good news if we put Lauri on the market is that there are a bunch of teams that would put in a strong offer but you can almost guarantee that the thunder would come in with a godfather offer to beat it. Not only is Lauri a great fit with them and instantly jumps them to the top of the west but it could be just as important to block opposing teams from getting Lauri as well.
It's OKC's picks and it's not close. The pure volume and diversity of them is crazy. I think the real prize is the 2026 clipper pick and the 27 clipper pick swap. Those 2 could be Celtics/nets type of gold and any Lauri deal to OKC would have to include those.Fun trade question for anyone willing to do the leg work:
Who owns the best pick over the next 3 years? Qualifications being it has to be another team's pick, not their own.
I feel like prior to the season starting, we would have said OKC's Houston picks, but now I'm not sure.
I said best pick, not best picks. Like the best single individual draft pick asset.It's OKC's picks and it's not close. The pure volume and diversity of them is crazy.
Fun trade question for anyone willing to do the leg work:
Who owns the best pick over the next 3 years? Qualifications being it has to be another team's pick, not their own.
I feel like prior to the season starting, we would have said OKC's Houston picks, but now I'm not sure.
Out of those I would probably says Clippers 2026, and probably by a huge margin.Houston owns Brooklyn’s 2026 unprotected 1st
Pelicans own Lakers 2024 unprotected 1st with the right to delay until 2025
Nets own the Suns 2025 unprotected 1st
Jazz own the Cavaliers and Timberwolves 2025 unprotected 1sts
Spurs own the Hawks 2025 unprotected 1st
Thunder own the Clippers 2026 unprotected 1st
Hard to say but all of these could be pretty juicy.