That's some sweet *** music to my ears.
Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz
- Thread starter Ferguson_Mellochill
- Start date
That's some sweet *** music to my ears.
Handlogten's Heros
Well-Known Member
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
2025 Prediction Contest Winner
I think maybe you get a junk first for him without a negative deal... maybe??? Like a top 14-18 protected that turns into two seconds?
Not really. There were multiple reports about Vando being wanted by teams. Maybe it wouldn't be just Vando straight up for a first. It might have been Vando + taking back salary (but not egregious salary).
Sexton is honestly a must-trade if the long-term planning is extending Jordan Clarkson.
I kind of agree with that. Although, I'm not sure why you would prioritize 30 year old Clarkson over 23 year old Sexton.
The Jazz really need to deal with the Knicks. Put aside whatever bad blood might have developed over the Mitchell trade talks. Deal with them.
They are on the outside looking in for a play-in spot, but the East is super clustered currently. Knicks sit at 11th, but are only two games out from being the 4th seed. They have a **** ton of assets and a lot of underperforming young players. They should be an incredibly easy trade partner.
They are on the outside looking in for a play-in spot, but the East is super clustered currently. Knicks sit at 11th, but are only two games out from being the 4th seed. They have a **** ton of assets and a lot of underperforming young players. They should be an incredibly easy trade partner.
Because apparently Ryan Smith has only agreed to let Danny have full control as long as he gets to keep his bestie.
Would you trade Malik Beasley for Joe Harris and swap the order of the favorability for the Sixers/Nets pick?
*Meaning Utah would now get the more favorable of the Nets/Sixers picks, not the least favorable*
Harris has had injury issues last 2 seasons and has dropped of a bit and his contract is a bit more expensive and doesnt have the team option for the final year like Beasley's does.
*Meaning Utah would now get the more favorable of the Nets/Sixers picks, not the least favorable*
Harris has had injury issues last 2 seasons and has dropped of a bit and his contract is a bit more expensive and doesnt have the team option for the final year like Beasley's does.
Also the Lakers are looking much better and Anthony Davis is back to God-Tier level play. That should make the Lakers much more willing to make a drastic move to improve the team.
Bad News: Russ has actually kind of been OK and accepted his new role. Their best avenue to get better might involve trading Pat Bev, not Russ, so for Utah to be involved it would have to be a 3 team deal of some sort since we cant trade for Beverly.
Bad News: Russ has actually kind of been OK and accepted his new role. Their best avenue to get better might involve trading Pat Bev, not Russ, so for Utah to be involved it would have to be a 3 team deal of some sort since we cant trade for Beverly.
Probably not, but what is your prediction for the differential between the two picks? Right now they are only a half game different from each other.
Handlogten's Heros
Well-Known Member
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
2025 Prediction Contest Winner
I might... the other Beasley deal I thought about was what about Atlanta for Bogdonovic and either the Sacramento pick they own or an Atlanta pick. Bogey has an 18M option next year that is problematic for Atlanta and has been hurt so frequently.
I think Sexton would be a tremendous fit on the Bucks. They are still pretty asset strapped due to the Jrue trade (Id love Beauchamp tho) and all their top contracts are all very important players to their team. Not a lot of fat to cut from their team salary wise to be able to bring in someone of Sexton's contract size.