When the Jazz trade him I will be vindicated and everyone will realize they agreed with me the whole time.
You truely are clueless sometimes. Midseason buyers dont care about future value. They care about immediate impact, fit to the team and box score history. Sexton also looks more like a project on tape while JC looks more like a finished product.Who do you think has more value: Sexton or Clarkson?
You want to tank, yet you want to trade the player you claim is helping the tank more.When the Jazz trade him I will be vindicated and everyone will realize they agreed with me the whole time.
LmfaoYou truely are clueless sometimes. Midseason buyers dont care about future value. They care about immediate impact, fit to the team and box score history. Sexton also looks more like a project on tape while JC looks more like a finished product.
Sexton is more valueable only if we use him as a chip to trade with a rebuilding team, but that would make us the buyer.
To add on just to laughing at you.You truely are clueless sometimes. Midseason buyers dont care about future value. They care about immediate impact, fit to the team and box score history. Sexton also looks more like a project on tape while JC looks more like a finished product.
Sexton is more valueable only if we use him as a chip to trade with a rebuilding team, but that would make us the buyer.
Sexton absolutely helps the tank, but so will NAW, so will THT, so will Ochai. The Jazz have no shortage of mediocre backups guards who aren't ready to be starters.You want to tank, yet you want to trade the player you claim is helping the tank more.
You want to rebuild, yet you want to trade away a 23 year old future prospect and extend a 30 year old win now piece sharing a similar skillset.
Somewhere inside your head this all makes sense.
Fascinating.
Stockton?All players are either traded or released at some point though right?
Tony Finau gonna be our ****ing GM some day.And Sexton/Clarkson in no way have similar skill sets. They have similar overarching roles (scorers) but they go about it very differently.
And Clarkson is flat out better and he's (supposedly) loved by the owner so it's something we have to live with I guess.
Would be interested to see how a Mike Conley would impact John Collins effectiveness.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G--fGaIimXo