Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

[Mongoose]

it isn't lol
I am surprised how many Jazz fans think it is

it isnt what? on the table? worth the risk? a wasted opportunity?

 

[Jingled]

View: https://twitter.com/KeithSmithNBA/status/1622964356643274754

 

[whatthe]

it isnt what? on the table? worth the risk? a wasted opportunity?

I think the Stepien rule, but I think you can keep the Stepien rule by trading swap for another swap in the same year. The bigger question is, would the Lakers want to do it?

 

[Benchwarmer]

I think he’s saying that it might be a wasted opportunity to swap with the Lakers pick if the Pelicans improve to the point that the puck we get back from the Lakers is negligible. I’d say it’s worth the risk. Just make the deal if it’s on the table.

But what I'm saying is that the Pels have the swap rights, so the Lakers could only offer the worse pick of the two... Which will probably be in the upper teens.
Sure it's better than a pick around 25-30, but not really all that valuable, considering we already have our own and Minnesota's pick.

 

[default]

But what I'm saying is that the Pels have the swap rights, so the Lakers could only offer the worse pick of the two... Which will probably be in the upper teens.
Sure it's better than a pick around 25-30, but not really all that valuable, considering we already have our own and Minnesota's pick.

15-20 is much better than 25-30

 

[Mongoose]

Is the rumor mill and trade market heating up on Korkmaz yet? haha

 

[idiot]

You know, I'm skeptical that the Jazz can get worthwhile first rounders for any the players we're looking to trade individually.

So what would you think of this trade (money going out and coming back is within $100,000)?:
Conley, Clarkson, Vando, KO (4/5th of our starting lineup at the beginning of the season) for Westbrook, Gabriel, Toscano-Anderson, and Damien Jones, plus the 2 LAL firsts.

I'm guessing Jazz don't really want to go there (does nothing to make team better until end of the decade, other than give lots of cap space next season). And Lakers will balk because it apparently shatters their summertime flexibility, plus I really doubt they end up giving up both picks.

But ... if you want to give Lebron and AD a chance this year, that's starting to look like a very deep team with lots of flexibility around them.

 

[sip]

You know, I'm skeptical that the Jazz can get worthwhile first rounders for any the players we're looking to trade individually.

So what would you think of this trade (money going out and coming back is within $100,000)?:
Conley, Clarkson, Vando, KO (4/5th of our starting lineup at the beginning of the season) for Westbrook, Gabriel, Toscano-Anderson, and Damien Jones, plus the 2 LAL firsts.

I'm guessing Jazz don't really want to go there (does nothing to make team better until end of the decade, other than give lots of cap space next season). And Lakers will balk because it apparently shatters their summertime flexibility, plus I really doubt they end up giving up both picks.

But ... if you want to give Lebron and AD a chance this year, that's starting to look like a very deep team with lots of flexibility around them.

If the lakers are willing to make that deal then you definitely do it.

 

[David Stern]

You know, I'm skeptical that the Jazz can get worthwhile first rounders for any the players we're looking to trade individually.

So what would you think of this trade (money going out and coming back is within $100,000)?:
Conley, Clarkson, Vando, KO (4/5th of our starting lineup at the beginning of the season) for Westbrook, Gabriel, Toscano-Anderson, and Damien Jones, plus the 2 LAL firsts.

I'm guessing Jazz don't really want to go there (does nothing to make team better until end of the decade, other than give lots of cap space next season). And Lakers will balk because it apparently shatters their summertime flexibility, plus I really doubt they end up giving up both picks.

But ... if you want to give Lebron and AD a chance this year, that's starting to look like a very deep team with lots of flexibility around them.

I think we’d need more back than that

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Why would the pels trade down? Lakers don't control that swap.

The Pels are taking the Lakers pick which means the Lakers get the Pels pick. The trade means wee ouod get the Pels pick and the Lakers would get the worse of the Sixers/Nets pick. Pels are not trading down

 

[whatthe]

it isnt what? on the table? worth the risk? a wasted

The Pels are taking the Lakers pick which means the Lakers get the Pels pick. The trade means wee ouod get the Pels pick and the Lakers would get the worse of the Sixers/Nets pick. Pels are not trading down

opportunity?

The Pels are taking the Lakers pick which means the Lakers get the Pels pick. The trade means wee ouod get the Pels pick and the Lakers would get the worse of the Sixers/Nets pick. Pels are not trading down

I would even do the Lakers trade without the 2027/2029 if we can get the Lakers/Pels swap and a 2028 swap plus a 2RP.

 

[fishonjazz]

You know, I'm skeptical that the Jazz can get worthwhile first rounders for any the players we're looking to trade individually.

So what would you think of this trade (money going out and coming back is within $100,000)?:
Conley, Clarkson, Vando, KO (4/5th of our starting lineup at the beginning of the season) for Westbrook, Gabriel, Toscano-Anderson, and Damien Jones, plus the 2 LAL firsts.

I'm guessing Jazz don't really want to go there (does nothing to make team better until end of the decade, other than give lots of cap space next season). And Lakers will balk because it apparently shatters their summertime flexibility, plus I really doubt they end up giving up both picks.

But ... if you want to give Lebron and AD a chance this year, that's starting to look like a very deep team with lots of flexibility around them.

That trade doesnt include any of the core 4 so i would probably do it


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app