Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

[whatthe]

I would get the Lakers pick and trade it at the first chance in a big value trade.

 

[nateboz]

1 draft pick for 3 starters. That's a major no. Plus the guys utah is sending have reasonable contracts. Conley is overpaid but nothing crazy.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

Lol you guys are either seriously overrating our guys or seriously underrating the Lakers pick we’d get back.

Remember when we traded Bogey for KO... man people see what we got for our all stars and think every mfer on the roster worth a stack of picks.

 

[Coach Ellis]

1 draft pick for 3 starters. That's a major no. Plus the guys utah is sending have reasonable contracts. Conley is overpaid but nothing crazy.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

I’d do it for one unprotected Lakers pick (27 or 29) and a pick swap this year.

Our guys have value, but it’s not crazy good value. I want to be greedy as much as the next person, but I think there’s some limitation as to what types of assets we’ll be getting back from guys like Beasley, Conley, Vando, Clarkson and Olynyk. I think the real value is by consolidating them so a team can justify paying out a premium draft pick to get them all.

 

[Handlogten's Heros]

1 draft pick for 3 starters. That's a major no. Plus the guys utah is sending have reasonable contracts. Conley is overpaid but nothing crazy.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

So 1 pick for an overpaid starter and two bench players... cuz that's what Malik and Vando are... sounds fair to me.

 

[framer]

They literally cannot take Vando back due to CBA rules.

I mean we could throw him in a Lakers Jersey tonight, THEN send him. . .

 

[nateboz]

I’d do it for one unprotected Lakers pick (27 or 29) and a pick swap this year.

Our guys have value, but it’s not crazy good value. I want to be greedy as much as the next person, but I think there’s some limitation as to what types of assets we’ll be getting back from guys like Beasley, Conley, Vando, Clarkson and Olynyk. I think the real value is by consolidating them so a team can justify paying out a premium draft pick to get them all.

Danny was quoted back saying he values these guys as 1 first each. 1 for all 3 isn't going to happen.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

 

[Thee Jazz Fan]

Minneapolis news guy

View: https://twitter.com/DWolfsonKSTP/status/1623459175056408578?t=ZuPnhL2ZLSQysVm80XRG7Q&s=19

This feels like déjà vu all over again with the Mitchell to New York talks. Reported advanced stages almost done but then nothing happens. Lol

 

[David Stern]

Live footage of the negotiations (except Danny keeps saying no and calls Connelley the pancake eating *************)


View: https://youtu.be/QT1Tl6npLic

 

[Bawse Dawg]

Lol you guys are either seriously overrating our guys or seriously underrating the Lakers pick we’d get back.

Royce got us a first. Beasley and Vanderbilt are in that tier. And yes, I do have trouble assigning proper value to a pick that is 5 years out. But the Lakers are historically a destination for top players, so I’m not just gonna pencil it in as a top five pick.

 

[nateboz]

So 1 pick for an overpaid starter and two bench players... cuz that's what Malik and Vando are... sounds fair to me.

1 starter and 2 guys who would easily be starter/ 6th man on most nba teams. It's been reported how every nba team has called about Vanderbilt. Conley is still a top tier pg. Beasley has the 4th most 3s in the nba. These guys aren't just random end of the bench guys.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

 

[Elizah Huge]

Royce got us a first. Beasley and Vanderbilt are in that tier. And yes, I do have trouble assigning proper value to a pick that is 5 years out. But the Lakers are historically a destination for top players, so I’m not just gonna pencil it in as a top five pick.

Outside of LeBron who have they signed in the last 20 years? Hell, they’ve been in the lottery twice WITH LeBron already.