What's new
By:

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

To all the Rudy fanboys you can look at literally every title team in the past decade and they all had a 25+ ppg scorer. How many had a center averaging 12 ppg on a super max?
 
fishonjazz said:
Rather than not making the playoffs now and then losing in the first round in 4-5 years. Ya probably.
Click to expand...

Here's the thing.... the players that made the Jazz who they were the last 3 years are going to be gone. Conley, Bojan and Ingles are all getting old. They're declining. This run is over. Jazz sold high on Gobert, and the others will be gone by the start of the year. Jazz probably keep Clarkson to be a fan favorite and for some continuity, but that's it.

If the Jazz get a big offer for Mitchell, they'll move him too probably.
 
YoungJefe said:
Rudy gobert was a consistent scorer?
Click to expand...
I think you could make that argument but you’d first have to define “scorer”. However, I did not make that claim.

I think Mitchell, Conley, Bogey, and Clarkson would qualify as scorers. That’s four players, and that’s what I said in my post.

There is a portion of the GED exam about reading comprehension so you should prepare for it.
 
Elizah Huge said:
The Grizzlies were in the lottery 3 years in a row and they are the best case scenario for this.

Philadelphia was in the lottery 6 years in a row lmao.
Click to expand...
Hell the jazz had favors (#3), Burks (#12), kanter (#3), trey burke (not sure but I think like #9), hayward (cant remember but might have been lottery), dante exum (#4 or #5 cant remember)
Lots and lots of busts available in the lottery. And forget busts. Lots of not even close to stars available in the lottery.
 
fishonjazz said:
Hell the jazz had favors (#3), Burks (#12), kanter (#3), trey burke (not sure but I think like #9), hayward (cant remember but might have been lottery), dante exum (#4 or #5 cant remember)
Lots and lots of busts available in the lottery. And forget busts. Lots of not even close to stars available in the lottery.
Click to expand...

No way, I was told the 3rd and 4th potential prospects of next years draft was guaranteed to be better than Mitchell.
 
NUMBERICA said:
Sure. But nobody was talking about Jokic as a completely unique multi-MVP candidate either. I’m aware that such an argument can also be made for your position, but my position is that more picks that are higher in the draft always increase your odds of finding top-tier talent. Because it does.
Click to expand...
Some people have the position that an all star is a top tier talent. Donovan mitchell made the all star team. Is he top tier talent?
 
Elizah Huge said:
Dude… that posts says exactly what I just said. Are you on something right now?
Click to expand...

Man you're slow. Fine, I'll spoonfeed it.

You yesterday, in response to me not wanting to trade Mitchell for Ayton & Bridges.

Elizah Huge said:
No, I have no idea what you are. You want us to have complete **** players and no building blocks. Getting Ayton is a building block. He is not going to lead us to the playoffs by himself. Is Ayton + a top-5 pick better or worse than a top-5 pick and no other good young players?
Click to expand...
Elizah Huge said:
Dude you are ****ing lost. You want us to have zero good players right?
Click to expand...

You today:

Elizah Huge said:
It is textbook what we shouldn’t do if we traded Donovan. We can get a piece like Shai but I have no interest in keeping players that will make us any semblance of being respectable.
Click to expand...
 
fishonjazz said:
Hell the jazz had favors (#3), Burks (#12), kanter (#3), trey burke (not sure but I think like #9), hayward (cant remember but might have been lottery), dante exum (#4 or #5 cant remember)
Lots and lots of busts available in the lottery. And forget busts. Lots of not even close to stars available in the lottery.
Click to expand...

Yup. An element of luck is involved for sure. And it's a numbers game. That's why you want to load up on picks. Draft with some of them and trade some of them for solid players.
 
Elizah Huge said:
No way, I was told the 3rd and 4th potential prospects of next years draft was guaranteed to be better than Mitchell.
Click to expand...

In this last draft, I would have traded Mitchell for Banchero straight up. In this draft, I would probably trade Mitchell for Wemby, Scoot, Amen and possibly Ausur. However, no team is going to give us those young prospects for Mitchell. They'd laugh at us.

The whole argument is also moot because Mitchell probably isn't going to be here 2 years from now. There's no scenario where the Jazz retool around Mitchell if Mitchell is just going to leave.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top