Remember when Hawks fans said the deal would be Collins for Lauri and picks lmao.
We can all agree that ain't happening lol.Remember when Hawks fans said the deal would be Collins for Lauri and picks lmao.
I like where your head is at not sure that the suns do that deal. It is not the worst. If the Jazz get Collins and a FRP danny would be elevated to a basketball god.Jazz in: John Collins/2023 Phoenix 1st
Jazz out: Jarred Vanderbilt/Kelly Olynyk/Rudy Gay
Suns in: Jarred Vanderbilt/Rudy Gay
Suns out: Jae Crowder/2023 1st
Hawks in: Jae Crowder/Kelly Olynyk
Hawks out: John Collins
Thoughts?
I like where your head is at not sure that the suns do that deal. It is not the worst. If the Jazz get Collins and a FRP danny would be elevated to a basketball god.
My perspective is completely opposite. With man defense positional assignments dont matter.. matchups do.Positions are fluid... but in general the rule is you are what you defend. In that case Vando ends up on more wings and guards... but is definitely playing center on offense. KO is guarding centers... Lauri is guarding 4s, 5s, and sometimes 3s. The ideal position for both Vando and Lauri is at the 4... maybe KO too.
I would say we have a bunch of guys suited to play the 4 ideally... and not many that are traditional SF types. Beasley is more a SG... but stuff is so fluid it doesn't matter all that much. I would say we lack a SF archetype more than a PF archetype regardless of where players have logged time.
Fun fact: They are still discussing it... albeit now in a past tense "why didnt we take that offer".Remember when Hawks fans said the deal would be Collins for Lauri and picks lmao.
yeah its all too fluid to worry about. I think Lauri is so flexible too. I would say you just plan to put the right types of players around Lauri and Kessler rather than worrying about what position they are.My perspective is completely opposite. With man defense positional assignments dont matter.. matchups do.
But you are right that things are more fluid so these historical designations are partially rubbish.
However if you try to suggest that Lauri should go to weak side corner instead of playing next to the primary ballhandler, I respectfully disagree. Or that Vando should play closer to the ball.
Lauri is a wing, and has been a wing since he left the bulls. Or a stretch 5. But not 4... at least not primarily.
Its ridiculous in the sense that they should be able to do better for Collins but I also get it based on how some view JC as a fit. Like "if they want this garbage offer they can have it". Its not like those people are the JC advocates.Fun fact: They are still discussing it... albeit now in a past tense "why didnt we take that offer".
Some here offer Gay and THT for Collins. Tbf, its almost equally ridiculous.
Its ridiculous in the sense that they should be able to do better for Collins but I also get it based on how some view JC as a fit. Like "if they want this garbage offer they can have it". Its not like those people are the JC advocates.
There is none... its just someone saying something to show how little they like a player... not like they are being serious and pushing for that deal.What’s the point of even discussing garbage offers like that though?