He;s played Lauri, JV, KO, Kessler, and Udoka at the 5.....
Don't you ever get tired of being a dumbass? I know we get tired of it.Man you are a huge tool lmfao.
I guess every NBA team is deep at every position because techincally the coach can turn to his bench and be like "Hey you, go play that position"
Where they are in their experience doesn't mean **** when you say dumb things like Bones would help us win more now. Damn dude... just look at what Sexton does with starting type groups... the net is better than most of the Conley iterations of those lineups.Sexton has a -1.2 BPM and Hyland has a -0.6 BPM. I can also cherry pick advanced stats to say Hyland is better.
One is a 5th year player on an overpaid contract and the other is in the middle of his 2nd season trying to carry a mediocre to bad bench unit.
I watch teh games bud, I see what Sexton does. He has value as a guy who can get some buckets, but he does nothing for the team and is a negative with decision making and defense. Bones would be a big improvement for spacing and overall play.Where they are in their experience doesn't mean **** when you say dumb things like Bones would help us win more now. Damn dude... just look at what Sexton does with starting type groups... the net is better than most of the Conley iterations of those lineups.
You never said regular rotation. You just said guys the coach can play at that position. Just using your logic. Every NBA team is so deep at every position. It's wild.You think udoka has been a part of the regular rotation lolololololol
Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
Yeah, I think most would probably want Utah to add in a 2nd rounder.Not 1 single GM today would trade JV/NAW for Bones Hyland, LOL….
lolI watch teh games bud, I see what Sexton does. He has value as a guy who can get some buckets, but he does nothing for the team and is a negative with decision making and defense. Bones would be a big improvement for spacing and overall play.
If the point is just for the point guard to get lots of assists then you are right that the talent level for that isnt fine.Did I say best? I, in fact, did not. Your statement implied the talent at the position is fine, which, it is not.
Look, whenever I’ve talked sports with people, when they’ve said “we’re deep at this position”, they’ve implied the talent is fine there. So when you said, “PG is our deepest position”, it sure seems like you’re saying the talent there is fine. Now perhaps you’ve decided to come up with your own definitions for words, and change what the implied perceptions are. Very possible. If you are doing that, it’s wise to inform others so that we don’t think you’re a blithering idiot.
Cy is correct that we need a PG because Conley is old, declining, and will hopefully/probably get traded. Sexton isn’t a true PG. Other guys might get spot minutes there, but they aren’t PG’s either. The Jazz need talent, and depth, at the PG position going forward. Fact.
You never said regular rotation. You just said guys the coach can play at that position. Just using your logic. Every NBA team is so deep at every position. It's wild.
I think shooting guard is probably our deepest position. We really only have two point guards on the roster...Naw and THT have both gotten minutes at point mostly out of necessity, both guys have been shooting guards throughout their career, and that's probably the position they are best suited for.