Kyoto
Well-Known Member
He doesn't provide anything that the Jazz needs. We already got rid of a high energy small PF that cant shootSo, in other words, you’re saying his size isn’t an issue.
Sent from my SM-G965U using JazzFanz mobile app
He doesn't provide anything that the Jazz needs. We already got rid of a high energy small PF that cant shootSo, in other words, you’re saying his size isn’t an issue.
He doesn't provide anything that the Jazz needs. We already got rid of a high energy small PF that cant shoot
Price doeThis. I liked Trevor but if we needed what he would bring we could have just kept Crowder.
We didn't get rid of Crowder to get rid of him, he was necessary for the trade to get Conley.This. I liked Trevor but if we needed what he would bring we could have just kept Crowder.
Since when is 6'8" not considered undersized as a PF? Dont tell me, "the modern Pf blah blah blah", if he is not undersized then Joe or Bojan isnt undersized. If we already have 3 players that could play PF (Green, Ingles, Bojan) then why would we need a 4th?
What we dont have is another true sized PF
Sent from my SM-G965U using JazzFanz mobile app
Which other forwards meet that description on the team for you? And a career 30% from 3 is better than what Favors did or Bradley will ever do. We don't have a player like Booker on the roster.Meh. There are dozens of players who are as good or better than Booker. Another forward who can't shoot isn't going to help us.
Meh. There are dozens of players who are as good or better than Booker. Another forward who can't shoot isn't going to help us.
Which other forwards meet that description on the team for you? And a career 30% from 3 is better than what Favors did or Bradley will ever do. We don't have a player like Booker on the roster.
I would sign Booker and release/waive Bradley... I love Booker doe. I think Bradley is a waste of a roster spot. Only reason he is on the roster is sunk ded fallacy.