What's new

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

This kind of fits here too, as part of the bigger conversation about what Trump and his ill-prepared and uninitiated criminal cohorts might do about this.

 
This kind of fits here too, as part of the bigger conversation about what Trump and his ill-prepared and uninitiated criminal cohorts might do about this.

You see an article about the US being rated poorly in access to care, health outcomes, administrative efficiency, care process, and equity as related to why you think Donald Trump is a dictator? At least @Red thinking fascism comes from riding gold escalators actually includes Donald Trump and dictators.
 
I am proud of trump for one thing so far though. At least none of his picks are more corrupt, scandalous, immoral, and dishonest than he is. So good job on that at least.

Probably simply due to his ego. He loved comparing himself to Al Capone and saying that he was in trouble with the law more than Capone. Even though that is a lie it shows that to trump, having issues with the law is a good thing and he wouldn't want anyone else in his cabinet to have more law trouble than himself as that would mean they are better than he is probably.
More legal trouble than Al Capone.

Has done more for "the blacks" than Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King combined.

Protects women more than Tampax, whether they like it or not. Touches women in ways even more intimate than Tampax, too, whether they like it or not.

Has done more for America as President than George Washington.

The least racist person to ever exist.

Has a really really good brain. So good that he can remember complex sequences of information such as: Man, Woman, Camera, TV, Person. He is particularly proud of this ability.

Has a hard time fitting into a medium sized pair of gloves.

He is better at controlling the "Weave" than Gale from Baldur's Gate 3.

Has the most desirable mail-order bride in U.S. history.

When he toured the Sunkist factory he made the oranges look pale in comparison.

Has more McDonalds rewards points then Wimpy.

Most of his children still want to be included in his will.
 
Some simpletons have been like "trump was president from 2016-20 and it didn't get out of hand and he wasn't a dictator or a facist so that is evidence that this term will be just more of the same"

Ya, this administration will be nothing like the last one.

One difference this time is that he's elevating people he largely knows and likes, as opposed to strangers boasting impressive credentials and résumés. In his first term, he nominated a retired four-star general, James Mattis, for defense secretary. Mattis had commanded troops in wartime and was considered a blend of soldier and scholar, with a library of thousands of books.

As homeland security chief, Trump at the time chose John Kelly, another retired four-star general, whose son was killed fighting in Afghanistan.

Trump broke with both men, ousting Mattis and parting ways with Kelly after having brought him into the White House to be his chief of staff.

At the time, both Mattis and Kelly were seen as "adults in the room" who would guide a new president who'd never held public office.



That model didn't suit Trump, and he's plainly abandoning it as he shapes a new presidency.

The Gaetz and Hegseth announcements, in particular, drew backlash.

Neither has run anything as complex and consequential as the departments they’d be leading. Hegseth was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq and served in the National Guard for more than 19 years.

"You need two things: competence and character. You need people who have deep, large, organizational experience, ideally with the public sector. We’re not seeing that with these picks,” said Max Stier, chief executive of the Partnership for Public Service, a nonprofit group devoted to improving government effectiveness.

Gaetz has been investigated over allegations of sex trafficking of a 17-year-old girl.

A Justice Department official called the Gaetz announcement "truly stunning”; another labeled it “insane.”

From bitter experience, Trump knows that he needs an attorney general he can trust implicitly, and it might be worth the political capital to battle for Gaetz's confirmation.



Little happened in Trump’s first term that angered him as much as Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ decision to recuse himself and appoint a special counsel to investigate whether there were links between his 2016 campaign and Russia.

“This is the end of my presidency. I’m f—,” Trump said, according to a report filed by the special counsel, Robert Mueller.

He went on to fire Sessions. And he later feuded with another appointee, William Barr, who angered him by saying the 2020 election wasn’t stolen, as Trump has falsely claimed.

In Gaetz, Trump would get an attorney general who has said Trump won the election that year, as well as an iconoclast who shares his willingness to upset the status quo.

“I don’t care if it takes every second of our time and every ounce of our energy," Gaetz said at a conference of conservative activists last year. "We either get this government back on our side or we defund and get rid of — abolish the FBI, CDC, ATF, DOJ, every last one of ’em if they do not come to heel."
 
Some simpletons have been like "trump was president from 2016-20 and it didn't get out of hand and he wasn't a dictator or a facist so that is evidence that this term will be just more of the same"

Ya, this administration will be nothing like the last one.

One difference this time is that he's elevating people he largely knows and likes, as opposed to strangers boasting impressive credentials and résumés. In his first term, he nominated a retired four-star general, James Mattis, for defense secretary. Mattis had commanded troops in wartime and was considered a blend of soldier and scholar, with a library of thousands of books.

As homeland security chief, Trump at the time chose John Kelly, another retired four-star general, whose son was killed fighting in Afghanistan.

Trump broke with both men, ousting Mattis and parting ways with Kelly after having brought him into the White House to be his chief of staff.

At the time, both Mattis and Kelly were seen as "adults in the room" who would guide a new president who'd never held public office.



That model didn't suit Trump, and he's plainly abandoning it as he shapes a new presidency.

The Gaetz and Hegseth announcements, in particular, drew backlash.

Neither has run anything as complex and consequential as the departments they’d be leading. Hegseth was deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq and served in the National Guard for more than 19 years.

"You need two things: competence and character. You need people who have deep, large, organizational experience, ideally with the public sector. We’re not seeing that with these picks,” said Max Stier, chief executive of the Partnership for Public Service, a nonprofit group devoted to improving government effectiveness.

Gaetz has been investigated over allegations of sex trafficking of a 17-year-old girl.

A Justice Department official called the Gaetz announcement "truly stunning”; another labeled it “insane.”

From bitter experience, Trump knows that he needs an attorney general he can trust implicitly, and it might be worth the political capital to battle for Gaetz's confirmation.



Little happened in Trump’s first term that angered him as much as Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ decision to recuse himself and appoint a special counsel to investigate whether there were links between his 2016 campaign and Russia.

“This is the end of my presidency. I’m f—,” Trump said, according to a report filed by the special counsel, Robert Mueller.

He went on to fire Sessions. And he later feuded with another appointee, William Barr, who angered him by saying the 2020 election wasn’t stolen, as Trump has falsely claimed.

In Gaetz, Trump would get an attorney general who has said Trump won the election that year, as well as an iconoclast who shares his willingness to upset the status quo.

“I don’t care if it takes every second of our time and every ounce of our energy," Gaetz said at a conference of conservative activists last year. "We either get this government back on our side or we defund and get rid of — abolish the FBI, CDC, ATF, DOJ, every last one of ’em if they do not come to heel."
America voted for Trump.

We are Trump.
 
America voted for Trump.

We are Trump.
It is one form of the responses of never-Trumpers. There are some flaws that have plagued our society for many generations. Sooner or later, maybe we’ll be better than this. But first, Trump 2.0. So far, some of his picks signal an idiotocracy.

 
Who needs an experienced civil service anyway?

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...opy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share

“And just like that, Donald Trump broke the federal government.

The U.S. government is more than an array of marble buildings. It’s an aggregation of expertise, a collection of individuals who have inherited an ethos and a set of practices handed down through the decades. Ever since Trump’s second victory last week, these long-standing denizens of the bureaucracy, a tier of career employees who occupy their job regardless of the partisan affiliation of the president, have mulled leaving the government. How could they not? Some of them are on purge lists drawn up by right-wing think tanks, named as enemies marked for retribution. They all know of Trump’s plans to strip them of the tenured status that traditionally protects the civil service from the whims of political bosses. And they have read Project 2025, in which the theorists behind the incoming administration write plainly about the necessity of destroying agencies”.
——————————————————————
Another asinine choice:

 
Last edited:
I love that most of these articles about "why did Trump choose so and so" gloss over or completely ignore the fact that his decision-making has one criteria: how loyal are they to Trump and what he wants to do. Period. That's it. Sure they might be some agency or another adjacent, and have some interest in whatever group he put them in charge of, but in the end the decision comes down to unwavering fealty to the DICKtator. How much are they willing to lick his boots. That is all that matters. Everything else they put in those articles is just fluff.
 
Although I was not focused on masculine vs. feminine in our culture wars, I’m realizing more now how this issue is somewhat at the heart of who Americans want to be. And why it’s no surprise that some here have always promoted toxic masculinity in these political threads…so terrified that men with nurturing natures are somehow “unmanly”. And empathy for others is a sign of weakness. What a sad, sad view of the world in 2024….

 
Back
Top