What's new

Utah = Battle Ground State. Does that change your vote?

Part of you wants him to win? Which part of you is it exactly? Let "let it burn part"? The part that gives zero ****s about ethnic and religious minorities that would feel the full brunt of a Trump presidency? Or maybe the part that obviously has no respect for women? Watch your mouth, cause words matter, dude.

It's hilarious that some are so willing to watch the world burn just to get the result they want. Funny, this is something someone here accused Libtards of; massive changes and complete overhaul no matter the cost. I guess they don't take into account the right wing nuts who want to see Jesus so bad they welcome the apocalypse. Herp ****ing derp.

Some conservatives have their heads so far up their own asses during this election its laughable.

You either didn't read my whole post or were too eager to respond to be able to properly process it. Read it again and get back to me.

Hint: What if Trump isn't as extreme as this is going to go? What if he is the calm before the storm?
 
Last edited:
A woman (I think?) did an exposé on the CIA/drug trafficking years ago too that three Presidents not only knew about but helped keep going in essence, mostly through Mena, Arkansas (with the help of pilot Barry Seal) where Clinton was governor before being President. You can find some of it online. I wanna say the Post decided not to run it or she was fired for it or something. Pretty crazy stuff. Tom Cruise is playing Seal in a movie about it--it being loosely used. It's filming now and I assume will be mediocre as Cruise hasn't made anything very good since Collateral which is 12 years now but I'm holding out hope.

I think this probably has something to do with that BCCI banking scandal from the 90's or so - it was a bank founded by investors from the Middle East that also essentially functioned as a front for money laundering for the Middle Eastern governments and it had major connections to the Medellin Cartel. Somehow I feel there may have also been some connection to the Iran-Contra affair under Reagan in the 80's but I may be getting my scandals confused.

BCCI also set up a U.S. bank holding company but its connections to that bank were so convoluted that the principals in the American bank seemed to have no idea that some of the people connected to the American bank were also connected to BCCI. Somehow (I'd have to see if I can find the details) someone who had been an acquaintance of Bill Clinton's during his time as AR governor received funding from a bank that turned out to have some ties to people who were involved with BCCI.

My take on it all at the time was that because A is friends with B and B is friends with C and C has some friends with connections to a drug cartel, according to the Wall Street Journal, if you are "A" and your last name is Clinton and you're running for President of the United States, then through your connections to B and their connection to C, you have connections to a drug cartel, and therefore you are almost a criminal yourself and should not be President. And they wrote six volumes about this.
 
You either didn't read my whole post or were too eager to respond to be able to properly process it. Read it again and get back to me.

Hint: What if Trump isn't as extreme as this is going to go? What if he is the calm before the storm?

I read it, and my post wasn't directed so much at you as it was to that particular statement and to those that post the same sentiment.

I would hope, and a H.C. win would confirm this trend, that Trump is actually a sign of the demise of the racist underbelly of the conservative right wing. Yes, they may bring an even worse candidate next election, but with demographic trends in the U.S., I can't help but feel that the increase in minority population will further diminish the party of the movement, aka scared white people, that get more and more radical each election season.

A Trump victory would only empower the those that think increased diversity in the U.S. is a bad thing. His policy would reflect that and only serve to keep the country as white as possible and keep them the majority. A Trump defeat will be way better, trust me.

PS. @alt13 sorry, reading my post did sound overly harsh towards you. not my intention.
 
I read it, and my post wasn't directed so much at you as it was to that particular statement and to those that post the same sentiment.

I would hope, and a H.C. win would confirm this trend, that Trump is actually a sign of the demise of the racist underbelly of the conservative right wing. Yes, they may bring an even worse candidate next election, but with demographic trends in the U.S., I can't help but feel that the increase in minority population will further diminish the party of the movement, aka scared white people, that get more and more radical each election season.

A Trump victory would only empower the those that think increased diversity in the U.S. is a bad thing. His policy would reflect that and only serve to keep the country as white as possible and keep them the majority. A Trump defeat will be way better, trust me.

PS. @alt13 sorry, reading my post did sound overly harsh towards you. not my intention.

Yeah there is a racist underbelly in the gop but that isn't the whole story. Trump had a hard time in closed republican primaries. Where he really won the nomination is with the non-republican vote. Independents and democrats that bought into his nationalist platform. Trump didn't create this he unlocked what was already there. The optimistic side of me is shocked and is certain it will be over soon. The pessimistic side of me is scared ****less that this is just the tip of the iceberg.
 
I read it, and my post wasn't directed so much at you as it was to that particular statement and to those that post the same sentiment.

I would hope, and a H.C. win would confirm this trend, that Trump is actually a sign of the demise of the racist underbelly of the conservative right wing. Yes, they may bring an even worse candidate next election, but with demographic trends in the U.S., I can't help but feel that the increase in minority population will further diminish the party of the movement, aka scared white people, that get more and more radical each election season.

A Trump victory would only empower the those that think increased diversity in the U.S. is a bad thing. His policy would reflect that and only serve to keep the country as white as possible and keep them the majority. A Trump defeat will be way better, trust me.

PS. @alt13 sorry, reading my post did sound overly harsh towards you. not my intention.


And one thing I hope the racist fringe of white America realizes after the election is that they don't even make up the majority view of white people. I sincerely hope that like me most white people don't want to live in a racist world.

#****trump
 
I've noticed that people are very aggresive towards Trump. We must stay cool and not let ourselves get carried away.

In the end we're all curious about what he will actually accomplish during his presidency.
 
I've noticed that people are very aggresive towards Trump. We must stay cool and not let ourselves get carried away.
In the end we're all curious as to what he will actually accomplish during his presidency.

Not really.
 
I've noticed that people are very aggresive towards Trump. We must stay cool and not let ourselves get carried away.

In the end we're all curious about what he will actually accomplish during his presidency.

He's not going to be the president.

If he does become the president every KKK member and every neo-Nazi will celebrate, because he is THEIR candidate. They love him. They support him like they've never supported any American Presidential candidate in the last 50 years. He's their guy. There is a lot of very good reasons why they like him. For those same reasons I hate him. I loathe him. He makes my stomach turn. I see a guy who acts like Mussolini and talks like a retarded Hitler.

If retarded Hitler is who you want, I won't judge you. But look at this jackass! Look at all the quotes fishonjazz has posted, the **** that this guy says. I want a president with some degree of dignity and class. Trump has ruled himself out for me because he has conducted himself in the most despicable way. I know street thugs that carry themselves better. I know ex-cons who are more careful about the things they say.

Trump is disgusting to me. Disgusting in a very real way. He makes me sick. He coddles hatred and fear. He sings to the lowest of our national character. He is THE UGLY AMERICAN. The smirking, belligerent, oblivious jerk, who shines a light on our faults and holds them up as our strengths and casts a shadow on our greatness.
 
retarded_hitler.jpg
 
He's not going to be the president.

If he does become the president every KKK member and every neo-Nazi will celebrate, because he is THEIR candidate. They love him. They support him like they've never supported any American Presidential candidate in the last 50 years. He's their guy. There is a lot of very good reasons why they like him. For those same reasons I hate him. I loathe him. He makes my stomach turn. I see a guy who acts like Mussolini and talks like a retarded Hitler.

If retarded Hitler is who you want, I won't judge you. But look at this jackass! Look at all the quotes fishonjazz has posted, the **** that this guy says. I want a president with some degree of dignity and class. Trump has ruled himself out for me because he has conducted himself in the most despicable way. I know street thugs that carry themselves better. I know ex-cons who are more careful about the things they say.

Trump is disgusting to me. Disgusting in a very real way. He makes me sick. He coddles hatred and fear. He sings to the lowest of our national character. He is THE UGLY AMERICAN. The smirking, belligerent, oblivious jerk, who shines a light on our faults and holds them up as our strengths and casts a shadow on our greatness.

I agree that Trump is the first major national candidate the Klan has felt able to explicitly and enthusiastically support in many decades. But it wasn’t that long ago that the Klan and other white supremacist groups rallied behind Pat Buchanan, an ideological carbon copy of Trump, back in the 1990s. It’s just that back then Buchanan was too fringe for the Republican Party. Now his radical views have been mainstreamed. In fact, Buchanan is now accusing Trump, in a complementary and almost wistful way, of stealing all his ideas, right down to the border wall and his version of the make America great again slogan.

Buchanan and Trump are both nativistic populists, or what Buchanan likes to call ethno-nationalists; they oppose free trade and immigration, pander to fears of out of control crime, and have a nostalgic, racialized view of the world. The only real difference is that Buchanan came right out and said whites need to take back their country before it’s too late. So far, Trump, despite his constant derision of political correctness, has been unable to acknowledge the ideological foundation of his campaign and give proper credit to Pat Buchanan, its intellectual founding father.
 
Back
Top