What's new
By:

Utah Jazz and Enes Kanter Workout Report

colton said:
My compilation is better :-)... but for what it's worth I have the same individuals in almost the same order.
6 Kawhi Leonard (11-11-11-11-10-9-5-6-7-8)
7 Kemba Walker (5-5-5-5-5-6-7-5-5-7)
8 Jonas Valanciunas (7-4-8-7-8-7-9-8-8-5)
9 Bismack Biyombo (8-8-7-8-7-8-8-9-9-9)
10 Alec Burks (9-9-9-10-9-10-10-10-10-10)
11 Tristan Thompson (12-15-13-13-12-12-11-11-11-11)
12 Marcus Morris (14-14-12-12-13-13-13-12-12-12)
Click to expand...

Yeah, this lists JV at 8. If the Jazz could get Washington's unprotected 2012 pick as partial payment for swapping the 3rd for the 6th I think I might be ok with JV as consolation.
 
BENTLEY said:
Yeah, this lists JV at 8. If the Jazz could get Washington's unprotected 2012 pick as partial payment for swapping the 3rd for the 6th I think I might be ok with JV as consolation.
Click to expand...

Contrary to popular belief, I feel the Wiz will suck again next year .. so my opinion differs to many.
 
Well, the Wiz out-sucked the Nets this year. So that's something. But if the Wizards are drafting 6th this year, what makes anyone think their pick next year will be better than that?

The Jazz got the lucky bounce in the lottery--a 1-in-5 chance or something. Why get talked out of the pick when Kanter, Knight or Williams WILL be there. Any one of those is a major building piece. Plus, the Jazz need to fulfill Sir Kick's dream.

The Jazz would have to be sold hook, line and sinker on Biyombo or Vesely OVER Kanter and Knight to even consider trading down to #6.
 
I agree they have to be sufficiently sold on a guy in the 6 range to agree to do this. Yeah, it's a gamble but it's one worth considering. I'd consider it, and I have Kanter as my number 1 prospect in the draft. There's some question as to how much better he'll be than Valanciunas and some would say Valanciunas will eventually be the better of the two. I don't know, I'm not a part of the workouts. But I do think Washington could very likely suck again next year. Even if their 2012 pick falls again to the 6th pick, it is still a nice asset that could be combined with another asset to move up to grab Harrison Barnes. JV + Barnes might be better than just Kanter.

Yeah there are risks, but even Kanter is a risk.

But I don't think this will happen anyway, so I hope the Jazz draft Kanter.
 
As I have read through this thread it seems like many of you are forgetting that if we want to trade down with anyone in this draft, we would be doing it during the draft. Everyone is talking about taking a risk of trading down to #6 and then "what would happen if Knight" or someone else we wanted wasn't there? The point is, you discuss the scenario with Washington before the draft... and they say hey Jazz would you be willing to give us Kanter if you draft him? The Jazz then say no, unless you give us XY&Z and our second choice "Brandon Knight falls". If Brandon Knight doesn't fall we keep Kanter. Its not like there is risk in this at all.

If the Jazz feel that Knight is by far the better prospect and fit for their needs, and they don't want to risk not getting him regardless of the trade benefits with Washington they pass on the trade. If they feel like Kanter and Knight are equally good for their needs they listen...simple as that. No one seems to get that.
 
jazzman12 said:
Utah rolled the dice when they dealt D-Will and their reward was lottery luck that vaulted them into the top 3. Sometimes you have to simply capitalize on the luck you've had, instead of trying to parlay it into more luck. As I've said quite a few times already, at that point it becomes extremely easy to out-smart yourself.

The fascination that some Jazz fans have with trading down in this draft is simply mind-boggling.
Click to expand...

Yes, lucky that it turned out to be the #3 pick, but it was a virtual lock that NJ wasn't going to make the playoffs. The Jazz - and Nets - knew that Deron had a hurt wrist. Sure they won a few games right after the trade, but 2 of those were against the woeful Raptors. I was never really worried NJ would make a push for the playoffs. But Washington has a legitimate shot at the #7 or #8 seed next season. No way would I ever trade a #3 for a possible #14 or #15 next year. I don't care how weak you view this draft or how deep the next one MIGHT be projected. I'd gladly take Kanter, Knight or Williams over Walker and a complete unknown next year.

blackham has a point...the only way you make this deal is to draft Kanter #3 and then see if Knight (or someone else the Jazz like) is available at #6. Then the Jazz and Wizards trade the rights to their draft picks, along with any other assets. That's exactly what happened with Brandon Roy and Randy Foye back in 2006.
 
blackham9258 said:
As I have read through this thread it seems like many of you are forgetting that if we want to trade down with anyone in this draft, we would be doing it during the draft. Everyone is talking about taking a risk of trading down to #6 and then "what would happen if Knight" or someone else we wanted wasn't there? The point is, you discuss the scenario with Washington before the draft... and they say hey Jazz would you be willing to give us Kanter if you draft him? The Jazz then say no, unless you give us XY&Z and our second choice "Brandon Knight falls". If Brandon Knight doesn't fall we keep Kanter. Its not like there is risk in this at all.

If the Jazz feel that Knight is by far the better prospect and fit for their needs, and they don't want to risk not getting him regardless of the trade benefits with Washington they pass on the trade. If they feel like Kanter and Knight are equally good for their needs they listen...simple as that. No one seems to get that.
Click to expand...

Alright - now tell me what we should do in the following scenario.

If the Jazz do not want Kanter (hence they'd rather trade down), and they want Knight as well as wanting to trade down with Wizard for additional assets?

You pick Kanter at #3, and tell Wizard to take Knight. But what if Toronto takes Knight? Then you're left with Kanter, which is not what you wanted to start with.

- then you're forced to tell them to pick whoever's left and what we've been saying is that whoever is left is crap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top