framer
Well-Known Member
--Rudy Goberts do not grow on trees. But neither do Donovan Mitchells.
They most certainly do. From the same tree, actually. The tree resides in Denver. . .
--Rudy Goberts do not grow on trees. But neither do Donovan Mitchells.
Not to mention he is a much better defender, both in man defense and playmaking defense.
Lol. No he isn't. They are both solid defenders. The only thing Rubio is way better at is playmaking, and stitches brought up a legitimate concern.
At some point in the season, Quin is going to be hard-pressed to keep both Rubio and Favors in the starting lineup. I wouldn't be surprised to see Favors traded by Dec./Jan.
I also wouldn't be surprised if Mitchell plays his way into finishing games with Rubio on the bench in the 4th quarter.
One way or another, when this team goes through a rough stretch, I think Quin is really going to struggle with having Rubio and Favors on the floor at the same time as Rudy.
Good work, jazzfan1071. If you don't mind, I'll use some of your assessments and add or change according to my impressions.
Rubio: As good a passer as advertised. Just not sure if he can thrive without some personnel changes. Need shooters at the 3 & 4 along with Hood at the 2 to allow Rubio to be a distributor.
Hood: Deadly tonight. And as others have mentioned, his body positioning is better on his 3's; he's getting his feet set. I see him averaging 18 pts/per. Concerned with his defense, though.
Ingles: Led the team in assists against the Kings, IINM. He's still a reluctant shooter. Don't see him averaging > 10 pts/per, even if he starts. Still believe Utah needs a better starting SF, with Ingles backing up everywhere as needed.
Favors: I like Favs. He's been a loyal soldier. But I just don't see how he can co-exist with Gobert, especially with another non-shooter in Rubio. Opponents can run Hood off the 3Pt line and just pack the paint. I could see Quin playing him 25/per. Sub him out early and then bring him back in at the backup 5.
Gobert: Going to compete with Hood for leader in pts. Is 18/14/3 too much to expect? I'd like to see Quin cut his minutes a bit this season to keep him fresher. Even a couple of DNP's to help him deal with nagging injuries and fatigue (yeah, I know, not going to happen).
Exum: Definite improvement. He looks aggressive and confident. Could make Rubio expendable in 2 years. I predict Jazz will match any offer for him.
Mitchell: Donovan should start, but won't. Exum/Mitchell might be the future at the 1/2, which would make Hood a trading chip to acquire a big SF or replacement for Favors?
Sefolosha: Better offensively than what I thought. He and Ingles are going to have some tough matchups this year. Thabo is going to play a lot.
Burks: How do Hood, Mitchell and Burks all get minutes? Someone is going to be traded.
One of Quin's core beliefs is everyone needs to touch the ball and have a hand in playmaking. I wouldn't expect those aspects to change that much.
The thing that sucks about the Favors situation is that Utah traded with the Lakers to move up 2 places for Bradley, when the Lakers also had the pick before taking Kuzma.
Kuzma's looking like a total steal and could've been the answer at the 4 for the future. Not that I dislike Bradley, but it will probably be a few years before anyone knows what he will be, when Kuzma might have been the answer to one of Utah's biggest questions.
Offensively that works, but defensively it's a nightmare. You have an undersized SG in Mitchell and a player in Hood who definitely cannot guard most of the WC SF's. Gobert can't compensate for multiple positions.Nice assessment. I think the solution by mid-season will be to move Hood to the starting 3 and play Mitchell at the 2. Burks backs up at the 2 and Ingles backs up at the 3.
A line-up with Rubio/Mitchell/Hood/Johnson/Gobert is probably our best closing unit. Ingles struggles when the pace speeds up. All 4 guys on the floor with Rubio have potential to score 20 pts. on any given night.
That said, the Jazz have plenty of depth and can keep these guys fresh with rotations.