And he's obviously done nothing good in that time. Negative *** ********.
Utah needs to pull a Toronto and start booing until our bench comes in.
- Thread starter Xsy
- Start date
And he's obviously done nothing good in that time. Negative *** ********.
DutchJazzer
Banned
he did way more bad than good(on the court speaking ofcourse)
Nowhere near enough to boo him imo.
DutchJazzer
Banned
Good to see that there will always be people waiting to make excuses for people despite having every resource available to be the best they can be.
One of the worst posts ever.
DutchJazzer
Banned
he gives ZERO EFFORT on deense.
He singlehandedly got us swept against the spurs. while players like carol and marvin where fighting.
he was on the court helping duncan screen our players.
when he was on the bench he spouted crap about spurs being unbeatable in the youngsters ear.
and most of all he will get us swept again, with his loser mentality and zero effort on defense.
how many times have you seen jefferson dive for a loose ball?
The Jazz got swept by the Spurs. Yes Al was a big part of it but saying he's the entire reason the Jazz got swept is more toward the ridiculous end of your scale.
Oh and you're wrong about the zero effort on defense. He's still a solid one-on-one post defender.
DutchJazzer
Banned
I bet you if al missed the series jazz would have won atleast 1 game.
detract any other player from the line-up jazz would still have been swept.
not saying if al missed the series jazz would have one.
but it would have been competitive, jazz would have atleast won one.
can you say the same for millsap, hayward, favors, caroll, harris or whoever missed the series we would have been swept?
DutchJazzer
Banned
because that can lead to stats(blockshots and steals)
those raise your per.
jefferson is just boozer with a better attitude.
but they care only about their stats
Because "you bet" it's true? The Jazz should have won game 4 but it was a 3 point brickfest at the end.
Regardless of motivation, it helps the Jazz when Al blocks shots, right? Or is that negative too?
Oh and the Jazz may have won a game if Hayward was capable of hitting the broad side of a barn, which he wasn't in the series.
DutchJazzer
Banned
jazz coould have one a game if hayward hit 2 more shots.
or favors blocked 3 more shots
or whatever.
but the only certainty in this wolrd is if al missed the series jazz would have MOST DEFINITELY won 1 game
or favors blocked 3 more shots
or whatever.
but the only certainty in this wolrd is if al missed the series jazz would have MOST DEFINITELY won 1 game
DJ, sometimes you're funny, and other times you're a *** ****. I'm going with the latter at the moment.
Yeah, even though I hate putting it on Hayward because he played a great game overall, he did try to take the big shots and utterly failed. I like that he tried and had the confidence to attempt it, but it just didn't work out. The ISO he had on Brandon Bass, where he got a pretty open shot, then air mailed it was kind of the dagger to the Jazz because I felt like it completely deflated Hayward's confidence and gave the Celtics the momentum.
Haha I was talking about the playoffs vs the Spurs. Last night the game wouldn't have even been close without G Time.
steelers6timechamps
Well-Known Member
then when the jazz start loosing even worse then you will be booing them. {wink,wink}