What's new

Weather Network ****s on Breitbart climate article

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date

Hahahahahahah!!!


Oh man. This is ****ing rich.

It is a survey of the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of the province of Alberta-- a group with the strong vested interest in the furthering of Albertan oil sands development. I know this because I ****ing live here. This is the same sort of stuff the tobacco industry would always do


--

Log, do you see how it's hard to take you intellectually seriously when you take conclusions from a poll of researchers of one organization in one province, and you use this to characterize all of academia?


This is why no one takes your climate change views seriously. An utterly Goebbelsian link to share.
 
Let's pull an excerpt from the study that the link that Log shared referenced to-- here, I'll pull the excerpt where they describe their research design:

How do professional experts frame the reality of climate change and themselves as experts, while engaging in defensive institutional work against others?

To answer this question, we consider how climate change is constructed by professional engineers and geoscientists in the province of Alberta, Canada. We begin by describing our research context and the strategic importance of Canadian oil worldwide, to the economy of Canada, and the province of Alberta. We outline the influential role of engineers and geoscientists within this industry, which allows them to affect national and international policy. Then, we describe our research design and methods.
Research context: an instrumental case
The petroleum industry in Alberta is an instrumental case (Stake, 1995; per Greenwood & Suddaby, 2006) to examine the debate of climate change expertise given the economic centrality of the oil industry, the oil sands as a controversial energy source, and the dominance of professionals that gives them a privileged position as influencers of government and industry policy. Frames are always socio-historical constructions and, thus, time and location play an important role.


Wow-- really sounds like they're trying to do a wide poll to characterize the lack of climate alarmism across the profession of climate scientists worldwide *rolls eyes*
 
Hahaha what percent of the alarmists are professor PhD's getting grants from Obama to verify climate alarmism? I bet yo take the money away it is more like 5 % not 37.

You do know [MENTION=54]Beantown[/MENTION] sells solar panels for a living an has a vested interest in warming alarmism?

Take climate change out of the picture....


Do you really want dirty air and water? Have you ever tried to breathe in SLC during the winter? Do you like seeing smog at our national parks? Are you proponent of child asthma and cancer?

I don't give **** if you don't believe in climate change. But it's pure ******** that you don't think we should be moving to clean up the very substances that all animal and plant life need to survive. Air and water.
 
Last edited:
Take climate change out of the picture....


Do you really want dirty air and water? Have you ever tried to breathe in SLC during the winter? Do you like seeing smog at our national parks? Are a proponent of child asthma and cancer?

I don't give **** if you don't believe in climate change. But it's pure ******** that you don't think we should be moving to clean up the very substances that all animal and plant life need to survive. Air and water.

I agree that we should be moving that way. Through methodical improvements and innovations across the board. I'm not for just a mad rush approach that cripples industries.

Yes push for it but slow and steady.

I feel that if the message was more along the lines of "we can improve here, here and here" instead of "disaster" than more people would listen.

But I'm probably pipe dreaming.
 
I agree that we should be moving that way. Through methodical improvements and innovations across the board. I'm not for just a mad rush approach that cripples industries.

Yes push for it but slow and steady.

I feel that if the message was more along the lines of "we can improve here, here and here" instead of "disaster" than more people would listen.

But I'm probably pipe dreaming.

But we are already seeing "disaster". 80% of US coasts are now man made. Florida is literally running out of beach and sand because of rising water. California is in the worst drought on record. Even New England is in the worst drought on record. Texas just saw the worst flooding on record.

Weather is getting more and more extreme each year. Beaches are eroding. Droughts and floods are at all time highs. You can't just simply ignore this.
 
Log can at least spend more effort into feeding his delusions. What's with this "I'll type 'climate change is not real' into Google, and paste whichever results pop up" approach?

Embarrassing.
 
what-if-its-all-a-hoax-cartoon.jpg
 
Here is another example. The Great Barrier Reef just had the largest die off coral because of increasing water temperature.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/29/world/australia/great-barrier-reef-coral-bleaching.html


If you believe scientists at all we cannot wait. We can't keep pumping carbon and pollution into the atmosphere.



And if they are wrong? Well BOO F"ING WHO WE ALL GET A CLEAN ENVIRONMENT TO LIVE IN.

You better hope that they're wrong cause we are going to blow the lid off every carbon limit that they try to set. You don't deny global warming but I'm certain that your CO2 footprint is way higher than what the climate scientists say it should be. If even the most supportive of climate science can't even bring themselves to take a cold shower there's no way that the average person is going to stand for it.
 
Log can at least spend more effort into feeding his delusions. What's with this "I'll type 'climate change is not real' into Google, and paste whichever results pop up" approach?

Embarrassing.

Just make sure you don't bother reading any of it or checking sources. Wouldn't want you challenging your cherished religious beliefs.
 
Just make sure you don't bother reading any of it or checking sources. Wouldn't want you challenging your cherished religious beliefs.

LOL. What nonsense. I don't think you even know anything about the subject.
 
Back
Top