Taking the "everyone should wear a leaf loin cloth" approach doesn't do the environmental side any benefit. The rational conservationists' approach is understanding that we like modern amenities and are not giving them up in the name of radical naturalism, and working from there for improvement where we see fit.
Taking the "everyone should wear a leaf loin cloth" approach doesn't do the environmental side any benefit. The rational conservationists' approach is understanding that we like modern amenities and are not giving them up in the name of radical naturalism, and working from there for improvement where we see fit.
Red
Well-Known Member
Trump team hints at scorched earth policy toward climate science...
https://mashable.com/2016/12/09/trump-energy-department-climate-lists/#5yfPWEzLSsqz
https://mashable.com/2016/12/09/trump-energy-department-climate-lists/#5yfPWEzLSsqz
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Is this the post you wanted me to reply to? Standard ad hominem and the normal leftist tactic of ignoring/denigrating sources rather than considering the facts and sources presented behind the opinions? And you wonder why I don't respond to this kind of drivel? Hilarious. Back on ignore.
Let's not dismiss perfectly arousing ideas out of hand...
DutchJazzer
Banned
man made climate change is a myth
I'm not intrigued.
DutchJazzer
Banned
and even if it wasnt a myth the answer is to green the earth. not all this carbon tax, and the anti human policy agendas of the UN
do you hate plants?
plants eat breathe co2. the answer to co2 is simple. plant more ****ing trees. green the sahara desert.
this climate change hysteria, it is a simple Kansas city shuffle. everybody is looking at co2. while there are REAL horrors going on in the environment. we should invest this time and money spent on "man-made climate change" on real climate issues. co2 is not polution, unlike real polutants we are releasing in our envoriment.
so i don't give a **** whether you are intrigued or not.
the climate has been changing forever.
CO2 is AWESOME
roll coal all day long bro
DutchJazzer
Banned
and by the way the sicence is not settled.
climate modeling method is not settled science. so far all climate models man made since "OMG global cooling era" have failed. none of em came true.
when climate change liars come up with real science not based on climate models, then we can say the science is settled.
isn't it ironic every single climate change model FAILED. yet we keep using the same stupid modeling method, and claim the science is settled. THIS IS LUNACY
the climate is always changing thats what climate does.
climate modeling method is not settled science. so far all climate models man made since "OMG global cooling era" have failed. none of em came true.
when climate change liars come up with real science not based on climate models, then we can say the science is settled.
isn't it ironic every single climate change model FAILED. yet we keep using the same stupid modeling method, and claim the science is settled. THIS IS LUNACY
the climate is always changing thats what climate does.
Last edited:
I am not a proponent of crawling backwards, dutch. I believe to solve this we need to move forwards, which means the solution is a technological one that doesn't involve us giving up our modern lifestyle. I don't think the green movement is in any way realistic or meaningful. It's a lot of feel good ********* that will never get us where we need to be.
I'm open to the idea that global worming is a catastrophe, but I'm also open to the idea that we can manage a warmer planet. I think planning for a warmer planet is time better spent than working to cool our planet back down.
I'm open to the idea that global worming is a catastrophe, but I'm also open to the idea that we can manage a warmer planet. I think planning for a warmer planet is time better spent than working to cool our planet back down.
