What's new

Weather Network ****s on Breitbart climate article

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
The fight against harmful pollution and climate change is the same fight. The sooner everyone comes to realize this the better off we will be.
 
The fight against harmful pollution and climate change is the same fight. The sooner everyone comes to realize this the better off we will be.


no IT IS NOT!
define harmfull. co2 is not harmfull!


there is way more harmful environmental pollution for example the lithium (and other such materials) mines that are used to make batteries to phones and devices we throw away every 12-24 months.


I don't accept your liberal "truth" about co2 being harmful. more actual science is needed to proof it. model based science is not settled science, it is not reliable. it is error prone the more complex the field of study is!


so yeah untill then i will roal coal. all hail co2. c02 is essential in the formation of all kinds of live :D
 
my ford bronco which is a guzzoline guzzler is friendlier to the environment than these liberals who get a new electric car every few years!
 
no IT IS NOT!
define harmfull. co2 is not harmfull!


there is way more harmful environmental pollution for example the lithium (and other such materials) mines that are used to make batteries to phones and devices we throw away every 12-24 months.


I don't accept your liberal "truth" about co2 being harmful. more actual science is needed to proof it. model based science is not settled science, it is not reliable. it is error prone the more complex the field of study is!


so yeah untill then i will roal coal. all hail co2. c02 is essential in the formation of all kinds of live :D

C02 in itself is not harmful. But you're living a lie if you think dumping huge amounts of C02 doesn't affect the earths atmosphere.

I guess I will just have to believe NASA and the science community over you.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
 
C02 in itself is not harmful. But you're living a lie if you think dumping huge amounts of C02 doesn't affect the earths atmosphere.

I guess I will just have to believe NASA and the science community over you.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

sorry bro i started to read that, and the first thing they state is already a LIE

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

sorry but if their first statement/sentence is an outright lie i just stop reading(kinda like how obummer lied in his speech about women earning less then men). how can i read further if they don't respect a simple truth!
 
Also [MENTION=499]LogGrad98[/MENTION]:

Even if renewables had higher incentives....wouldn't that be a good thing?

Why are you against getting away from energy production that causes cancer and child asthma? Are you that big of a douche?

Please post the quotes where I said any of that ****. Pretty Standard liberal rhetoric. If someone disagrees with any part of the argument you can accuse them of believing ANYTHING you want. That's easier than debating the actual facts presented when you can put words in other people's mouths.
 
Back
Top