What's new
By:

What PG do you want the jazz to go get?

PG for this season?

  • George Hill

    Votes: 21 27.3%

  • Darran Collison

    Votes: 3 3.9%

  • Garrett Temple

    Votes: 3 3.9%

  • Mario Chalmers

    Votes: 3 3.9%

  • Jose Calderon

    Votes: 4 5.2%

  • Norris Cole

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Keep Burke, Neto, and Cotton as our PGs

    Votes: 27 35.1%

  • Keep Burke, Neto, and Cotton, but actively search for a trade during the season

    Votes: 16 20.8%
  • Total voters
    77
Jarrett Jack he has 2 years left at 6.3 and the last year is non guaranteed I believe. I think we could get him for very little and would be a perfect fit for this Jazz team while we get healthy and things sorted out.
 
Our realistic plan should to be package Burke + Lyles for Hill. We could include picks if needed.
 
I really really want to see Neto play at least 20 minutes per game this coming season. I think Neto is a good enough defender and an above average playmaker. His shot is suspect but I think Burks, Hayward, Hood can help spread the court for him and allow him to get more space to shoot.
Tony Parker could not shoot his first years in the league. Neto can work his way into a greater role. Neto is my pick for for our future PG spot. I hope he starts this coming year as well. Or eventually takes over the job.

Dante can be the combo guard off the bench when he comes back from his injury.
 
I voted hill but i think the jazz should also look into beverly
 
dalamon said:
I've watched Lowry a ton, cuz 90% of the games on TV here are Raptors games.


Trust me, Conley is the best of this lot. Go for him in a sign-and-trade if we have any doubts with our PGs by next offseason.
Click to expand...

Trust me he says. Lolololololololololll

No.

Doing a sign and trade for a 29 year old Conley at the beginning of next season is one of the worst ideas I've seen on here.

He's an unrestricted free agent. So we don't need to give up anything for him if we want him. And we dont. He's good, but he isn't 5 year max money good. Plus we'd have to give up assets in a sign and trade. Also, it severely hampers who we can re-sign. I don't want Conley being one of our big 3. Which is all we will afford in the future. The Miller's aren't paying the tax. Certainly not for him.


So according to Dala in this thread and that Dr Jones one.

We should trade two first rounders to sign and trade Conley to a 5 year max deal when he is 29. While having to give up one of our current big 3 because we won't be able to afford all of them, when they re-sign. So basically we trade. Hayward, 2 firsts, and cap space to be stuck with a 30+ year old overrated non all star Conley.

Dalamon you are brilliant. No. I will not trust your crappy opinion.
 
What about my 3 way trade idea from the other thread.

Boston gets Manimal
Utah gets Thomas
Denver gets Burke, a first, a second.
 
I agree with Jarrett Jack being a good fit. He'll play defense, is big, doesn't shoot too much and is realistic.

Calderon as well as a guy who can and will facilitate, pass first, take care of the ball, knock down the 3 accurately and is realistic without giving up much.

Schroeder would be ideal, Atlanta isn't trading him. Hill, I believe would cost more than he's worth to the Jazz, otherwise he's a great fit. I tend to think Beverly falls into that category as well.

But ultimately, I'm perfectly fine with the baking the cake irt the PG situation. Just like last year, have Burke come off the bench, with Neto taking the place of Dante as the defensive minded starting PG who lets those who are good offensively do their thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top