What's new
By:

What should the FO do if we are 0.500 by January?

If you were put in charge of the FO, what would you do if the Jazz were 0.500 on January 1st

  • Go For It: Use assets to add to the team and go for the playoff push

    Votes: 11 17.7%

  • Ethical Tank: Trade Kessler and Lauri for whatever we can get

    Votes: 8 12.9%

  • Stand Pat: Let it ride, see how it goes

    Votes: 12 19.4%

  • Unethical Tank: sit Lauri and Kessler for however long the league will allow

    Votes: 31 50.0%
  • Total voters
    62
The tank looking pretty safe ....... because Hardy is gonna deliver another 30th ranked defense. Not my favorite kind of tank, but whatev.
 

What should the FO do if we are 0.500 by January?​


Give OKC the worst of our two picks in 31 to free our pick this year from any and all contingencies.
 
Feel pretty strongly about the unethical tank.

If a mega trade comes in for Lauri / Walk dogg, fine. Take it.

Otherwise let’s lose as much as we can with this young, fun roster.
 
Has any team ever turned a corner aggressively early January? Teams who have assets to invest wanna hold them to see who comes available (and possibly to see how they can sustain their health and success) and teams who are mid dont know what direction to pick. The correct decision deadline is MUCH more likely to be late January or early February like it always is... and that would put us to 20-20+ and it would be a whole different situation.

Also why isnt "deal with OKC" an option? The way I see it we are likely going to waste assets here anyways (except with the tanking shenanigans.... but that may not be politically feasible for many reasons).
 
HermanG said:
Has any team ever turned a corner aggressively early January? Teams who have assets to invest wanna hold them to see who comes available (and possibly to see how they can sustain their health and success) and teams who are mid dont know what direction to pick. The correct decision deadline is MUCH more likely to be late January or early February like it always is... and that would put us to 20-20+ and it would be a whole different situation.

Also why isnt "deal with OKC" an option? The way I see it we are likely going to waste assets here anyways (except with the tanking shenanigans.... but that may not be politically feasible for many reasons).
Click to expand...
I picked early January because by late January you are already locked in to some degree. This not meant to be a realistic scenario.
 
rippimpc said:
Would be funny if okc ends up with one of the big 3.
Click to expand...
They would have to have one of the big 3 fall to the 9th pick for that to happen I think.

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top