What's new

What type of asset is Hayward?

Yes. Because that was exactly what I was saying. Thank you

So by saying that burks should take Hayward's minutes, what exactly did you mean? I mean, you have, as you stated, watched more basketball than all of us, so you should know that a player who plays around 30 minutes a game can't really play that much more. So when you say burks should get Hayward's minutes, do you hunk burks is some kind of superman and can play more minutes than actually exist in a game? I mean, how many triple overtime games have you seen in your huge sample size if basketball games?
 
I disagree. We are in a completely different set of circumstances than San Antonio. San Antonio is trying to win a title now. We are trying to lose. If San Antonio wants Hayward for 11 per because he can increase their wins by 5 games, fantastic. By the same token, if we are going to "tank" again next year, wouldn't Hayward at 11 per, +5 wins really hurt the Jazz?

you snort too much coke. Take a ****ing nap.
 
So, if you aren't going to make the playoffs, what good does overpaying a player that will end up getting you the 10th pick instead of the fifth pick?

dude, you've got to start establishing a winning tradition at some point. Almost half our team will be composed of top10 picks. It's time to bust a nut on the floor and start winning some games next year.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];800842 said:
dude, you've got to start establishing a winning tradition at some point. Almost half our team will be composed of top10 picks. It's time to bust a nut on the floor and start winning some games next year.

Huh. Establish a winning tradition? What 25 years of playoffs didn't do that? Anyways, I'll establish that tradition with players that can win me a title, not just get me to the playoffs.
 
Huh. Establish a winning tradition? What 25 years of playoffs didn't do that? Anyways, I'll establish that tradition with players that can win me a title, not just get me to the playoffs.

So is your plan to keep tanking and trading for draft picks until the next lebron falls into our laps?
 
So is your plan to keep tanking and trading for draft picks until the next lebron falls into our laps?

sigh.

I'm getting really tired of this black and white posting of some members here. It's almost as if they know what the Jazz should do and what fans want but just want to be asses.
 
So by saying that burks should take Hayward's minutes, what exactly did you mean? I mean, you have, as you stated, watched more basketball than all of us, so you should know that a player who plays around 30 minutes a game can't really play that much more. So when you say burks should get Hayward's minutes, do you hunk burks is some kind of superman and can play more minutes than actually exist in a game? I mean, how many triple overtime games have you seen in your huge sample size if basketball games?

Yep. Again, because that was exactly what I was saying. This is the 2nd time now I've answered your question. How many more times must I answer it for you to understand?
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];800842 said:
dude, you've got to start establishing a winning tradition at some point. Almost half our team will be composed of top10 picks. It's time to bust a nut on the floor and start winning some games next year.

Yet, most of those top 10 picks came from weak drafts.

Typically, top 10 draft picks result in a franchise player. How many of those do we have?
 
More like 2 out of the 10, and thats in a good year.

I didn't say they all do. I said look at how many top 10'picks we've had yet look at our lack of franchise player/allstars. Sadly, those top picks were during some pretty terrible drafts.
 
Back
Top