LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Something with depth? Was there even a point to Mrs. Ben Affleck being in the movie? She seemed to just have a doctor-patient relationship with MM one second in the hospital to being wholly vested in their "relationship" the next (think the kitchen scene)...that scene with Garner being sooooo upset felt contrived because of the lack of development in her character, and specifically in her relationship with MM.
You thought the movie was depthless. I didn't.
In respect to Mrs. Garner, I don't think she needed anymore depth and I wasn't looking for it. There are principal actors and there are supporting. She was wholly supporting. I had no issues with her character like you did. The characters I wanted to know more about I did.
I gotta go with QuinSnydersHair on this one, and not just because it is so well-coifed. I think overall the story was so broad that it was hard to get very deep into any of his connections to people other than his partner dude/chick. See I can't even remember his/her name. His story alone took up so much of the movie it was hard to show the depth of his connection to other people. It seemed like he was the force of nature and everyone else was just swept along, kind of thing.
Like I said, I didn't analyze it that deeply, and I don't intend to watch it again to do so. We can agree to disagree on this.